ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2025
New Insight of Lipiodol Flush on Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Recurrent Implantation Failure Undergoing IVF/ICSI: a Prospective Study Based on Propensity Score Matching.
Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intrauterine infusion of oil-based medium in women with recurrent implantation failure before frozen embryo transfer: a randomized clinical trial.Reproductive health · 2025Trial
- Evaluating Lipiodol Efficacy in Proximal Tubal Occlusion Treatment: Single-Center Experience and Literature Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pregnancy outcomes in women with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI): does treatment with lipiodol flush matter? In this propensity score-matched study, we recruited 966 RIF patients who underwent IVF/ICSI from two tertiary hospitals. These patients were divided into groups based on whether they received lipiodol flush or not. Further stratification was applied to investigate the effect of lipiodol flush on pregnancy outcomes in RIF patients with different cycle type of embryo transferred. Then, patients subjected to lipiodol flush were categorized into three groups based on the duration of the interval: short interval (≤ 3 months), moderate interval (3-6 months), and long interval (≥ 6 months). The groups were well-matched at baseline. The lipiodol flush group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of biochemical pregnancy (46.27% vs. 56.22%, p = 0.046) and live birth (25.87% vs. 37.31%, p = 0.014). Subgroup analysis for fresh embryo transfer cycles revealed no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes. Among RIF patients underwent frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle, a statistically significant difference in the live birth rate was observed in the lipiodol flush group when compared to the control group (26.40% vs. 37.21%, p = 0.030). Analysis of different lipiodol flush intervals demonstrated a significantly lower live birth rate in the lipiodol flush group. Our results challenge the value of lipiodol use in clinical practice for the treatment of RIF.Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900024273. Registered 4 July 2019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39227527What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.