Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39227469›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025

Aesthetic Medicine Across Generations: Evolving Trends and Influences.

Mauro Barone, Riccardo De Bernardis, Paolo Persichetti

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mauro BaroneFondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128, Roma, Italy.
Riccardo De BernardisFondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128, Roma, Italy. riccardo.debernardis@unicampus.it.ORCID 0009-0006-6116-7711
Paolo PersichettiFondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128, Roma, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aesthetic medicine has grown exponentially in recent decades, becoming a key part of healthcare and wellness, with distinct generational demands shaping its landscape. Baby Boomers seek youthful rejuvenation, preferring noninvasive treatments like botulinum toxin injections and dermal fillers. Generation X favors natural, minimally invasive enhancements, often influenced by authentic testimonials. Millennials, driven by social media and self-care trends, prioritize preventive and enhancement procedures, sharing their experiences online. Generation Z, influenced by social media and digital beauty standards, focuses on prejuvenation and temporary enhancements. For industry professionals, understanding these generational dynamics and leveraging social media is essential to meet diverse patient expectations and enhance engagement.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Cosmetic TechniquesEstheticsRejuvenationSurgery, PlasticAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSkin AgingSocial MediaAesthetic medicineBaby boomersBody positivityDysmorphophobiaGenerationsGeneration XGeneration ZMillennialsSocial network

Identifiers

PMID39227469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.