SynthesisArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024
Assisted reproductive technology outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management of congenital female genital tract anomalies related to primary amenorrhea and/or cyclic abdominal pain: A retrospective cohort study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Congenital Uterine Anomalies and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The Role of Macrophages in Endometrial Cyclical Changes and Female Reproductive System Diseases: A Review.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Maternal and fetal outcomes in women with uterine congenital abnormalities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2026Review
- Unintentional Diagnosis of Uterus Didelphys in a Primigravida During Emergency Cesarean Section: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- Perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies in women with a unicornuate uterus.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Article
- Birth Outcomes in Pregnancies with Uterine Malformations: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Building a predictive model for pregnancy outcomes in ART patients based on AMH, FORT, HCG day EMT, and clinical characteristics.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe present systematic review aimed to assess the fecundity of women with congenital uterine anomalies (CUAs) undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART).
methodsThe present systematic review of the literature was reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. We systematically searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus, from database inception to 17th October 2023. Studies were deemed eligible only if they included women with CUAs clearly fitting into one of the categories of the ASRM Müllerian anomalies classification 2021.
resultsData relevant to the reproductive outcomes of women with CUAs who underwent ART were extracted from 55 studies. Regarding Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome, studies on gestational surrogacy reported a live birth rate (LBR) ranging from 37 to 54%. Uterus transplant, although still experimental, showed promising results. Most studies reported a negative impact of unicornuate uterus and partial or complete septate uterus on both the miscarriage rate (MR) and the live birth rate (LBR). The reproductive prognosis of women with unicornuate uterus was shown to be particularly poor in case of twin pregnancy. Uterus didelphys, bicornuate and arcuate uterus seem not to negatively impact the ART reproductive outcomes. Uterus didelphys was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth (PTB), cesarean section and low birth weight (LBW).
conclusionWomen with CUAs should be informed regarding the impact (if any) of their congenital anomaly on both the chances of success of ART and on pregnancy-related complications. Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) should always be the first choice in patients with an increased baseline obstetric risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39227392What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.