Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39227376›Full record

Trial reportTranslational psychiatry2024

Whole-brain mechanism of neurofeedback therapy: predictive modeling of neurofeedback outcomes on repetitive negative thinking in depression.

Masaya Misaki, Aki Tsuchiyagaito, Salvador M Guinjoan, Michael L Rohan, Martin P Paulus

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Effectiveness of fMRI-based Neurofeedback Therapy on Depression: A Systematic Review.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Amygdala self-neuromodulation capacity as a window for process-related network recruitment.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Masaya MisakiLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA. mmisaki@laureateinstitute.org.ORCID 0000-0002-6829-4311
Aki TsuchiyagaitoLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7606-1745
Salvador M GuinjoanLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Michael L RohanLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Martin P PaulusLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0825-3606

Funding

The Center for Neuroscience-based Mental Health Assessment and Prediction (NEUROMAP)P20GM121312 · NIGMS · LAUREATE INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN RESEARCH · PI MARTIN P. PAULUS · 2017 to 2026
$23.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121312U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) 1P20GM121312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-time fMRI neurofeedback (rtfMRI-NF) has emerged as a promising intervention for psychiatric disorders, yet its clinical efficacy remains underexplored due to an incomplete mechanistic understanding. This study aimed to delineate the whole-brain mechanisms underpinning the effects of rtfMRI-NF on repetitive negative thinking in depression. In a double-blind randomized controlled trial, forty-three depressed individuals underwent NF training targeting the functional connectivity (FC) between the posterior cingulate cortex and the right temporoparietal junction, linked to rumination severity. Participants were randomly assigned to active or sham groups, with the sham group receiving synthesized feedback mimicking real NF signal patterns. The active group demonstrated a significant reduction in brooding rumination scores (d = -1.52, p < 0.001), whereas the sham group did not (d = -0.23, p = 0.503). While the target FC did not show discernible training effects or group differences, connectome-based predictive modeling (CPM) analysis revealed that the interaction between brain activity during regulation and brain response to the feedback signal was the critical factor in explaining treatment outcomes. The model incorporating this interaction successfully predicted rumination changes across both groups. The FCs significantly contributing to the prediction were distributed across brain regions, notably the frontal control, salience network, and subcortical reward processing areas. These results underscore the importance of considering the interplay between brain regulation activities and brain response to the feedback signal in understanding the therapeutic mechanisms of rtfMRI-NF. The study affirms rtfMRI-NF's potential as a therapeutic intervention for repetitive negative thinking and highlights the need for a nuanced understanding of the whole-brain mechanisms contributing to its efficacy.

Indexed as

ConnectomeMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeurofeedbackAdultBrainDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGyrus CinguliHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedPessimismRumination, CognitiveTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39227376
PMCPMC11371824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.