Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39227336›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea)2024

Treatment Patterns and Persistence Among Patients Newly Diagnosed With Migraine in South Korea: A Retrospective Analysis of Health Claims Data.

Ki Yeon Kim, Hwa Yeon Ko, Sungho Bea, Ho-Jin Lee, Ju-Young Shin, Min Kyung Chu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ki Yeon Kim *Department of Biohealth Regulatory Science, School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9134-1357
Hwa Yeon Ko *School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5297-8826
Sungho BeaSchool of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2622-6553
Ho-Jin LeePfizer Pharmaceuticals Korea Ltd., Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7787-3537
Ju-Young ShinDepartment of Biohealth Regulatory Science, School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1010-7525
Min Kyung ChuDepartment of Neurology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. chumk@yonsei.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6221-1346

Funding

Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Korea Ltd
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeMigraine is one of the most common chronic neurological diseases worldwide. Although diverse treatment regimens have been recommended, there is insufficient evidence for which treatment patterns to apply in routine clinical settings.

methodsWe used nationwide claims data from South Korea for 2015-2021 to identify incident migraine patients with at least one prescription for migraine. Patients were categorized according to their initial treatment classes and followed up from the date of treatment initiation. Treatment regimens included prophylactic treatments (antidepressants, anticonvulsants, beta blockers, calcium-channel blockers, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system [RAAS] inhibitors) and acute treatments (acetaminophen, antiemetics, aspirin, ergotamine, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], opioids, and triptans). The treatment patterns of migraine were evaluated until the end of the study period, including the secular trends, prevalence, persistence, and changes in migraine treatment.

resultsAmong the 761,350 included patients who received migraine treatment, the most frequently prescribed acute treatment was an NSAID (69.9%), followed by acetaminophen (50.0%). The most-prescribed prophylactic treatment was flunarizine (36.9%), followed by propranolol (24.4%). Among the patients, 54.8% received acute treatment, 13.5% received prophylactic treatment, and 31.6% received both treatment types. However, 65.7% of the patients discontinued their treatment within 3 months. The 3-month persistence rate was highest for triptans (25.2%) among the acute treatments and for RAAS inhibitors (62.0%) among the prophylactic treatments.

conclusionsWhile the prevalence rates of medication use were found to align with current migraine guidelines, frequent switching and rapid discontinuation of drugs were observed in routine clinical settings.

Indexed as

acute painmigraineSouth Koreatreatment adherence

Identifiers

PMID39227336
PMCPMC11372211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.