ArticleJournal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea)2024
Treatment Patterns and Persistence Among Patients Newly Diagnosed With Migraine in South Korea: A Retrospective Analysis of Health Claims Data.
Article in Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Two-Year Outcomes and Interictal Burden After Treatment for Medication Overuse Headache.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Current landscape of migraine care with expert consensus from East Asia.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Review
- Characterizing migraine burden and treatment response using nationwide smartphone app-based data in Korea.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Eight Decades of Data Reveal a Far Greater Global Burden of Trigeminal Neuralgia.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Article
- Trends in the Burden of Headache Disorders in Europe, 1990-2021: A Systematic Analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The association of hemorrhoids with the incidence of heart failure: a nationwide cohort study.Annals of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Serial systemic immune inflammation indices: markers of acute migraine events or indicators of persistent inflammatory status?The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- Association of renal hyperfiltration with incidence of dyslipidemia: a nationwide retrospective longitudinal cohort study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Association between varicose veins and occurrence of dementia: A nationwide population-based cohort study.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeMigraine is one of the most common chronic neurological diseases worldwide. Although diverse treatment regimens have been recommended, there is insufficient evidence for which treatment patterns to apply in routine clinical settings.
methodsWe used nationwide claims data from South Korea for 2015-2021 to identify incident migraine patients with at least one prescription for migraine. Patients were categorized according to their initial treatment classes and followed up from the date of treatment initiation. Treatment regimens included prophylactic treatments (antidepressants, anticonvulsants, beta blockers, calcium-channel blockers, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system [RAAS] inhibitors) and acute treatments (acetaminophen, antiemetics, aspirin, ergotamine, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], opioids, and triptans). The treatment patterns of migraine were evaluated until the end of the study period, including the secular trends, prevalence, persistence, and changes in migraine treatment.
resultsAmong the 761,350 included patients who received migraine treatment, the most frequently prescribed acute treatment was an NSAID (69.9%), followed by acetaminophen (50.0%). The most-prescribed prophylactic treatment was flunarizine (36.9%), followed by propranolol (24.4%). Among the patients, 54.8% received acute treatment, 13.5% received prophylactic treatment, and 31.6% received both treatment types. However, 65.7% of the patients discontinued their treatment within 3 months. The 3-month persistence rate was highest for triptans (25.2%) among the acute treatments and for RAAS inhibitors (62.0%) among the prophylactic treatments.
conclusionsWhile the prevalence rates of medication use were found to align with current migraine guidelines, frequent switching and rapid discontinuation of drugs were observed in routine clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.