Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39227184›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2025

Psychometric Testing of an Instrument Assessing Family Knowledge, Contemplation, Confidence and Readiness for Engaging in Early Mobilisation of Critically Ill Patients: A Multi-Site Cross-Sectional Design.

Sasithorn Mukpradab, Michael Ireland, Georgia Tobiano, Kristen Ranse, Fiona Coyer, Kellie Sosnowski, Daren K Heyland, Andrea P Marshall

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the TOGETHER Family-Reported Experience Measure of Nurse-Facilitated Family Engagement in Adult Acute Care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sasithorn MukpradabSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2815-8673
Michael IrelandFaculty of Sciences, University of Southern Queensland, Ipswich, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6064-3575
Georgia TobianoMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5437-0777
Kristen RanseSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0196-9529
Fiona CoyerIntensive Care Unit, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8467-0081
Kellie SosnowskiSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6352-0674
Daren K HeylandQueen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6440-4616
Andrea P MarshallSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7692-403X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly mobilisation is beneficial to support recovery among critically ill patients. The literature highlights the benefits of family engagement in early mobilisation, yet this practice remains underutilised. Effective implementation depends on understanding the key antecedents that influence family engagement in early mobilisation, specifically families' knowledge, contemplation, confidence and readiness. However, no measurement tools currently exist to assess these. Therefore, developing a psychometrically supported instrument is essential to understanding and enhancing families' factors influencing their engagement in early mobilisation.

aimTo develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of an instrument to assess families' knowledge, contemplation, confidence and readiness to engage in early mobilisation.

designA multi-site cross-sectional survey design.

methodsBased on established psychological theory (Social Cognitive Theories and Behaviour Change Theories), an item pool was developed to assess families' knowledge, contemplation, confidence and readiness to participate in early mobilisation. To psychometrically evaluate the new tool, a multi-site cross-sectional survey was undertaken from May 2020 to June 2022 across five intensive care units in Australia. Data from 370 families of critically ill patients were used to evaluate the structural, convergent and discriminant validity as well as the reliability of the new instrument.

resultsConfirmatory factor analysis indicated good model fit, supporting the proposed structure. All items displayed high standardised factor loadings except one, which improved upon freeing an error covariance. Positive inter-factor correlations were moderate to strong and were substantially lower than the square root of the average variance extracted, supporting both convergent and discriminant validity, respectively. Additionally, all subscales demonstrated well to excellent reliability.

conclusionThe findings provide preliminary support for the multiple types of validity evidence and the reliability of the instrument. This new instrument is suitable for use in clinical and research applications to assess families' knowledge, contemplation, confidence and readiness for their engagement in early mobilisation. IMPACT: Family engagement in early mobilisation activities may have multiple benefits but it is not commonly implemented in the ICU. Factors influencing family engagement in early mobilisation are poorly understood. Influential psychological theories highlight the likely importance of knowledge, contemplation, confidence and readiness. A readily available instrument designed to assess these constructs among family members is needed to deepen research understanding and guide clinical practice. The proposed instrument is designed to measure factors influencing family engagement in early mobilisation, which may support healthcare professionals and health services to identify and tailor strategies to support family engagement in early mobilisation. REPORTING

methodRecommendations for reporting the results of studies of instrument and scale development and testing was followed to report this study. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Family members of adult critically ill patients participated in this study, and they provided the data through the survey.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessEarly AmbulationFamilyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePsychometricsAdultAgedAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesconfirmatory factor analysiscritically ill patientscross‐sectional studyearly mobilisationfamily engagementpsychometric testing

Identifiers

PMID39227184
PMCPMC11967298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.