Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39226929›Full record

ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2024

Monitoring soil fauna with ecoacoustics.

Jake M Robinson, Amy Annells, Timothy R Cavagnaro, Craig Liddicoat, Heidi Rogers, Alex Taylor, Martin F Breed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jake M RobinsonCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University , Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8108-3271
Amy AnnellsCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University , Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia.ORCID 0009-0004-9678-2760
Timothy R CavagnaroCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University , Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9922-5677
Craig LiddicoatCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University , Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4812-7524
Heidi RogersCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University , Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia.
Alex TaylorCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University , Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia.ORCID 0009-0005-1858-3907
Martin F BreedCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University , Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7810-9696

Funding

Australian Research CouncilNew Zealand Ministry
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecoacoustics-or acoustic ecology-aids in monitoring elusive and protected species in several ecological contexts. For example, passive acoustic monitoring (PAM), which involves autonomous acoustic sensors, is widely used to detect various taxonomic groups in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, from birds and bats to fish and cetaceans. Here, we illustrate the potential of ecoacoustics to monitor soil biodiversity (specifically fauna)-a crucial endeavour given that 59% of species live in soil yet 75% of soils are affected by degradation. We describe the sources of sound in the soil (e.g. biological, geological and anthropogenic) and the ability of acoustic technology to detect and differentiate between these sounds, highlighting opportunities and current gaps in knowledge. We also propose a roadmap for the future development of optimized hardware, analytical pipelines and experimental approaches. Soil ecoacoustics is an emerging field with considerable potential to improve soil biodiversity monitoring and 'soil health' diagnostics. Indeed, early studies suggest soil ecoacoustics can be successfully applied in various ecosystems (e.g. grasslands, temperate, tropical and arid forests) and land uses (e.g. agriculture, viticulture, natural and restored ecosystems). Given the low cost, minimal intrusiveness, and effectiveness in supporting soil biodiversity assessments and biosecurity risks, we advocate for the advancement of soil ecoacoustics for future land management applications.

Indexed as

AcousticsBiodiversitySoilAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringSoilbioacousticsbiomonitoringecoacousticssoil biodiversitysoil health

Identifiers

PMID39226929
PMCPMC11371423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.