ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2024
Modelling strategies supplemental to foot placement for frontal-plane stability in walking.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A modeling approach to understanding poor stability in people with vestibular hypofunction.Journal of biomechanics · 2026Article
- Study on the effectiveness and safety of balance instrument training on balance and lower limb motor function in patients with ischemic stroke hemiplegia.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
- Adapting lateral stepping control to walk on winding paths.Journal of biomechanics · 2025Article
- Modelling strategies supplemental to foot placement for frontal-plane stability in walking.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Walking is unstable and requires active control. Foot placement is the primary strategy to maintain frontal-plane balance with contributions from lateral ankle torques, ankle push-off and trunk postural adjustments. Because these strategies interact, their individual contributions are difficult to study. Here, we used computational modelling to understand these individual contributions to frontal-plane walking balance control. A three-dimensional bipedal model was developed based on linear inverted pendulum dynamics. The model included controllers that implement the stabilization strategies seen in human walking. The control parameters were optimized to mimic human gait biomechanics for typical spatio-temporal parameters during steady-state walking and when perturbed by mediolateral ground shifts. Using the optimized model as a starting point, the contributions of each stabilization strategy were explored by progressively removing strategies. The lateral ankle and trunk strategies were more important than ankle push-off, with their removal causing up to 20% worse balance recovery compared with the full model, while removing ankle push-off led to minimal changes. Our results imply a potential benefit of preferentially training these strategies in populations with poor balance. Moreover, the proposed model could be used in future work to investigate how walking stability may be preserved in conditions reflective of injury or disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.