ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Identification of molecular subtypes of dementia by using blood-proteins interaction-aware graph propagational network.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- NeuroFANN: identification of neuropathological subtypes in dementia with plasma proteins by using functionally annotated neural network.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- PPIxGPN: plasma proteomic profiling of neurodegenerative biomarkers with protein-protein interaction-based eXplainable graph propagational network.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plasma protein biomarkers have been considered promising tools for diagnosing dementia subtypes due to their low variability, cost-effectiveness, and minimal invasiveness in diagnostic procedures. Machine learning (ML) methods have been applied to enhance accuracy of the biomarker discovery. However, previous ML-based studies often overlook interactions between proteins, which are crucial in complex disorders like dementia. While protein-protein interactions (PPIs) have been used in network models, these models often fail to fully capture the diverse properties of PPIs due to their local awareness. This drawback increases the chance of neglecting critical components and magnifying the impact of noisy interactions. In this study, we propose a novel graph-based ML model for dementia subtype diagnosis, the graph propagational network (GPN). By propagating the independent effect of plasma proteins on PPI network, the GPN extracts the globally interactive effects between proteins. Experimental results showed that the interactive effect between proteins yielded to further clarify the differences between dementia subtype groups and contributed to the performance improvement where the GPN outperformed existing methods by 10.4% on average.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.