ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2024
The imprint of dissociative seizures on the brain.
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultra-high field brain MRI for functional neurological disorder: opportunities and challenges.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Review
- Changes in brain network dynamics during functional/dissociative seizures: An exploratory pilot study on EEG microstates.Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIncreased resting state functional connectivity between regions involved in emotion control with regions with other specializations, e.g. motor control (emotional hyperconnectivity) is one of the most consistent imaging findings in persons suffering from dissociative seizures (DS). The overall goal of this study was to better characterize DS-related emotional hyperconnectivity using dynamic resting state analysis combined with brainstem volumetry to investigate 1. If emotional hyperconnectivity is restricted to a single state. 2. How volume losses within the modulatory and emotional motor subnetworks of the neuromodulatory system influence the expression of the emotional hyperconnectivity.
methods13 persons with dissociative seizures (PDS) (f/m:10/3, mean age (SD) 44.6 (11.5)) and 15 controls (CON) (f/m:10/5, mean age (SD) 41.7 (13.0)) underwent a mental health test battery and structural and functional imaging at 3 T. Deformation based morphometry was used to assess brain volume loss by extracting the mean Jacobian determinants from 457 brain, forebrain and brainstem structures. The bold signals from 445 brainstem and brain rois were extracted with CONN and a dynamic fMRI analysis combined with graph and hierarchical analysis was used to identify and characterize 9 different brain states. Welch's t tests and Kendall tau tests were used for group comparisons and correlation analyses.
resultsThe duration of Brain state 6 was longer in PDS than in CON (93.1(88.3) vs. 23.4(31.2), p = 0.01) and positively correlated with higher degrees of somatization, depression, PTSD severity and dissociation. Its global connectivity was higher in PDS than CON (90.4(3.2) vs 86.5(4.2) p = 0.01) which was caused by an increased connectivity between regions involved in emotion control and regions involved in sense of agency/body control. The brainstem and brainstem-forebrain modulatory and emotional motor subnetworks of the neuromodulatory system were atrophied in PDS. Atrophy severity within the brainstem-forebrain subnetworks was correlated with state 6 dwell time (modulatory: tau = -0.295, p = 0.03; emotional motor: tau = -0.343, p = 0.015) and atrophy severity within the brainstem subnetwork with somatization severity (modulatory: tau = -0.25, p = 0.036; emotional motor: tau = -0.256, p = 0.033).
conclusionDS-related emotional hyperconnectivity was restricted to state 6 episodes. The remaining states were not different between PDS and CON. The modulatory subnetwork synchronizes brain activity across brain regions. Atrophy and dysfunction within that subnetwork could facilitate the abnormal interaction between regions involved in emotion control with those controlling sense of agency/body ownership during state 6 and contribute to the tendency for somatization in PDS. The emotional motor subnetwork controls the activity of spinal motoneurons. Atrophy and dysfunction within this subnetwork could impair that control resulting in motor symptoms during DS. Taken together, these findings indicate that DS have a neurophysiological underpinning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.