Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39226549›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

The Digital Platform and Its Emerging Role in Decentralized Clinical Trials.

Rachel R Copland, Sten Hanke, Amy Rogers, Lampros Mpaltadoros, Ioulietta Lazarou, Alexandra Zeltsi, Spiros Nikolopoulos, Thomas M MacDonald, Isla S Mackenzie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rachel R CoplandMEMO Research, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9618-1584
Sten HankeeHealth, FH Joanneum, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3833-4252
Amy RogersMEMO Research, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5207-7032
Lampros MpaltadorosInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research & Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-8652-7628
Ioulietta LazarouInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research & Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-5113-8366
Alexandra ZeltsiInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research & Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0009-0004-5262-6328
Spiros NikolopoulosInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research & Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-1367-5133
Thomas M MacDonaldMEMO Research, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5189-6669
Isla S MackenzieMEMO Research, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3680-7127

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) are becoming increasingly popular. Digital clinical trial platforms are software environments where users complete designated clinical trial tasks, providing investigators and trial participants with efficient tools to support trial activities and streamline trial processes. In particular, digital platforms with a modular architecture lend themselves to DCTs, where individual trial activities can correspond to specific platform modules. While design features can allow users to customize their platform experience, the real strengths of digital platforms for DCTs are enabling centralized data capture and remote monitoring of trial participants and in using digital technologies to streamline workflows and improve trial management. When selecting a platform for use in a DCT, sponsors and investigators must consider the specific trial requirements. All digital platforms are limited in their functionality and technical capabilities. Integrating additional functional modules into a central platform may solve these challenges, but few commercial platforms are open to integrating third-party components. The lack of common data standardization protocols for clinical trials will likely limit the development of one-size-fits-all digital platforms for DCTs. This viewpoint summarizes the current role of digital platforms in supporting decentralized trial activities, including a discussion of the potential benefits and challenges of digital platforms for investigators and participants. We will highlight the role of the digital platform in the development of DCTs and emphasize where existing technology is functionally limiting. Finally, we will discuss the concept of the ideal fully integrated and unified DCT and the obstacles developers must address before it can be realized.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicDigital TechnologyHumansSoftwareclinical trialsdecentralized clinical trialsdigitalizationdigital platformmobile phone

Identifiers

PMID39226549
PMCPMC11408899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.