ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2024
Effects of electron density force to 1.0 and fill to 1.0 on VMAT treatment plans for lung SBRT.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of electron density force to 1.0 and fill to 1.0 on VMAT treatment plans for lung SBRT.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study is to determine the effect of forcing and filling the electron density (ED) to 1.0 of the planning target volume (PTV) overdose distribution in lung SBRT treatment leading to shortening patient treatment time and increasing patient comfort by reducing MU/fraction due to ED manipulation effect.
methodsIn this study, 36 lung SBRT plans of 12 suitable patients who prescribed a total dose of 50 Gy in five fractions were generated with Monaco v.5.10 TPS using the Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique by PTV ED values forcing as well as filling to 1.0 and comparatively assessed. The first group of plans was created by using the patient's original ED, second and third groups of plans were reoptimized by forcing and filling the ED of PTV to 1.0, respectively, therefore acquiring a new dose distribution which lead to comparatively assessment the effects of changes in ED on PTV and OAR doses.
resultsAssessment of treatment plans revealed that mean MU/fx numbers were decreased by 76% and 75.25% between Groups 1 and 2, Groups 1 and 3, respectively. The number of segments was also reduced in Group 1 by up to 15% compared with Groups 2 and 3. Maximum HI and CI differences for PTV between Groups 1 and 2 were less than 1% and Groups 1 and 3 were 1.5% which indicates all 3 group plans were comparable in terms of dose distribution within PTV.
conclusionsForcing and filling the ED of PTV to 1.0 strategy has provided reduced a number of segments and MU/fx without a significant change in PTV mean and maximum doses, thereby decreasing treatment time and patient discomfort during treatment. This process should be considered in line of a potential number of patients as well as prescribed dose and MU/fx numbers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.