Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39226289›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Deep neural networks integrating genomics and histopathological images for predicting stages and survival time-to-event in colon cancer.

Olalekan Ogundipe, Zeyneb Kurt, Wai Lok Woo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Olalekan OgundipeDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Northumbria, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Zeyneb KurtInformation School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3186-8091
Wai Lok WooDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Northumbria, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationThere exists an unexplained diverse variation within the predefined colon cancer stages using only features from either genomics or histopathological whole slide images as prognostic factors. Unraveling this variation will bring about improved staging and treatment outcomes. Hence, motivated by the advancement of Deep Neural Network (DNN) libraries and complementary factors within some genomics datasets, we aggregate atypia patterns in histopathological images with diverse carcinogenic expression from mRNA, miRNA and DNA methylation as an integrative input source into a deep neural network for colon cancer stages classification, and samples stratification into low or high-risk survival groups.

resultsThe genomics-only and integrated input features return Area Under Curve-Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.97 compared with AUC-ROC of 0.78 obtained when only image features are used for the stage's classification. A further analysis of prediction accuracy using the confusion matrix shows that the integrated features have a weakly improved accuracy of 0.08% more than the accuracy obtained with genomics features. Also, the extracted features were used to split the patients into low or high-risk survival groups. Among the 2,700 fused features, 1,836 (68%) features showed statistically significant survival probability differences in aggregating samples into either low or high between the two risk survival groups. Availability and Implementation: https://github.com/Ogundipe-L/EDCNN.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsGenomicsNeoplasm StagingNeural Networks, ComputerDeep LearningDNA MethylationHumansMicroRNAsPrognosisROC CurveMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID39226289
PMCPMC11371203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.