Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39226283›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Prevalence and factors associated with external HIV-related stigma in the South African population: Results from the 2017 population-based household survey.

Vuyelwa Mehlomakulu, Musawenkosi Mabaso, Sean Jooste, Allanise Cloete, Sizulu Moyo, Leickness Simbayi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vuyelwa MehlomakuluPublic Health, Societies and Belonging Division, Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-3972-3295
Musawenkosi MabasoPublic Health, Societies and Belonging Division, Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
Sean JoostePublic Health, Societies and Belonging Division, Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
Allanise CloetePublic Health, Societies and Belonging Division, Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
Sizulu MoyoPublic Health, Societies and Belonging Division, Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-5296-3242
Leickness SimbayiPublic Health, Societies and Belonging Division, Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

External HIV-related stigma remains pervasive, and its effect debilitating among PLHIV in South Africa, even though the country has made many advances against HIV. External HIV-related stigma impedes both HIV prevention and access to health care and reduces the quality of treatment and care received. This study examined the prevalence of and factors associated with higher levels of HIV-related stigma among youth and adults 15 years and older in South Africa. The analysis used a nationally representative population-based household survey data collected using a multistage cluster random sampling design. Exploratory factor analysis was used to calculate the primary outcome (higher and lower HIV stigma index scores above and below the mean, respectively), based on the total number of factors retained from the 10 item self-reported questions relating to attitudes and beliefs against PLHIV. Bivariate and multivariate generalised linear models with a log link and binomial distribution were fitted to estimate crude and adjusted risk ratios (ARR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for factors associated with external HIV-related stigma. Of 38 919 respondents, 49% (49.8%; 95% CI: 48.6-51.1) were categorised as having higher levels of external HIV-related stigma. Higher levels of HIV-related stigma were significantly associated with those who had secondary level education than those with no education/primary education [ARR = 1.14 (95% CI: 1.05-1.24), p = 0.002], those employed than unemployed [ARR = 1.08 (95% CI: 1.02-1.14), p = 0.006], those in rural areas than urban areas [ARR = 1.15 (95% CI: 1.07-1.23), p<0.001], those who were aware of their HIV status than not aware [ARR = 1.34 (95% CI: 1.12-1.61), p<0.001], those who were HIV positive than HIV negative [ARR = 1.09 (95% CI: 1.02-1.17), p = 0.018], and those with no correct HIV knowledge and myth rejection than their counterparts [ARR = 1.09 (95% CI: 1.03-1.15), p = 0.002]. The findings highlight the need for peer-facilitated HIV-stigma reduction interventions targeting all types of educational institutions and the strengthening of work-based interventions. The findings emphasise the prioritisation of rural informal settings/tribal areas when developing and implementing HIV stigma reduction interventions. The study suggests that stigma reduction should be considered an important component of HIV testing and awareness. Addressing public misconceptions about HIV can mitigate externalised stigma.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSocial StigmaAdolescentAdultFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRural PopulationSouth AfricaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39226283
PMCPMC11371201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.