ArticlePLOS digital health2024
Towards artificial intelligence-based disease prediction algorithms that comprehensively leverage and continuously learn from real-world clinical tabular data systems.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward Precision Oral Medicine in Pemphigus Vulgaris: A Conceptual AI Framework for Rituximab Response Prediction.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Explainable AI-driven graph-based neural networks for mucopolysaccharidoses diagnosis.BioData mining · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This manuscript presents a proof-of-concept for a generalizable strategy, the full algorithm, designed to estimate disease risk using real-world clinical tabular data systems, such as electronic health records (EHR) or claims databases. By integrating classic statistical methods and modern artificial intelligence techniques, this strategy automates the production of a disease prediction model that comprehensively reflects the dynamics contained within the underlying data system. Specifically, the full algorithm parses through every facet of the data (e.g., encounters, diagnoses, procedures, medications, labs, chief complaints, flowsheets, vital signs, demographics, etc.), selects which factors to retain as predictor variables by evaluating the data empirically against statistical criteria, structures and formats the retained data into time-series, trains a neural network-based prediction model, then subsequently applies this model to current patients to generate risk estimates. A distinguishing feature of the proposed strategy is that it produces a self-adaptive prediction system, capable of evolving the prediction mechanism in response to changes within the data: as newly collected data expand/modify the dataset organically, the prediction mechanism automatically evolves to reflect these changes. Moreover, the full algorithm operates without the need for a-priori data curation and aims to harness all informative risk and protective factors within the real-world data. This stands in contrast to traditional approaches, which often rely on highly curated datasets and domain expertise to build static prediction models based solely on well-known risk factors. As a proof-of-concept, we codified the full algorithm and tasked it with estimating 12-month risk of initial stroke or myocardial infarction using our hospital's real-world EHR. A 66-month pseudo-prospective validation was conducted using records from 558,105 patients spanning April 2015 to September 2023, totalling 3,424,060 patient-months. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values ranged from .830 to .909, with an improving trend over time. Odds ratios describing model precision for patients 1-100 and 101-200 (when ranked by estimated risk) ranged from 15.3 to 48.1 and 7.2 to 45.0, respectively, with both groups showing improving trends over time. Findings suggest the feasibility of developing high-performing disease risk calculators in the proposed manner.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.