Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39226243›Full record

Observational studyPLoS medicine2024

A comprehensive assessment of care competence and maternal experience of first antenatal care visits in Mexico: Insights from the baseline survey of an observational cohort study.

Svetlana V Doubova, Claudio Quinzaños Fresnedo, Martín Paredes Cruz, Diana Perez-Moran, Ricardo Pérez-Cuevas, Verónica Meneses Gallardo, Luis Rey Garcia Cortes, Megan Carolina Cerda Mancillas, Victoria Martínez Gaytan, Miguel Angel Romero Garcia and 6 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PLoS medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Svetlana V DoubovaUnidad de Investigación Epidemiológica y Servicios de Salud del CMN SXXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0002-0521-7095
Claudio Quinzaños FresnedoDirección de Prestaciones Médicas, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México, México.
Martín Paredes CruzUnidad de Investigación Epidemiológica y Servicios de Salud del CMN SXXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0002-7029-1865
Diana Perez-MoranUnidad de Investigación Epidemiológica y Servicios de Salud del CMN SXXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0000-0002-2907-7146
Ricardo Pérez-CuevasDivision of Social Protection and Health, Interamerican Development Bank, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Verónica Meneses GallardoUnidad de medicina Familiar 31, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México, México.ORCID 0009-0007-0039-5937
Luis Rey Garcia CortesOOAD Estado de México Oriente, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Tlalnepantla de Baz, Estado de México, México.ORCID 0000-0003-3325-1458
Megan Carolina Cerda MancillasOOAD Coahuila, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Saltillo, Coahuila, México.
Victoria Martínez GaytanUnidad Médica de Alta Especialidad, Hospital de Gineco obstetricia N°23 Dr. Ignacio Morones Prieto, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Monterrey, Nuevo León, México.
Miguel Angel Romero GarciaJefatura de Prestaciones Médicas, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Monterrey, Nuevo León, México.
Gilberto Espinoza AnrubioOOAD DF Sur, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México, México.
Claudia Elsa Perez RuizOOAD Veracruz Norte, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Veracruz, México.
Carlos A Prado-AguilarOOAD Aguascalientes, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Aguascalientes, México.ORCID 0000-0002-3122-2955
Augusto Sarralde DelgadoOOAD Jalisco, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México.
Margaret E KrukDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9549-8432
Catherine ArsenaultDepartment of Global Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2410-3015

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComprehensive antenatal care (ANC) must prioritize competent, evidence-based medical attention to ensure a positive experience and value for its users. Unfortunately, there is scarce evidence of implementing this holistic approach to ANC in low- and middle-income countries, leading to gaps in quality and accountability. This study assessed care competence, women's experiences during the first ANC visit, and the factors associated with these care attributes. METHODS AND

findingsThe study analyzed cross-sectional baseline data from the maternal eCohort study conducted in Mexico from August to December 2023. The study adapted the Quality Evidence for Health System Transformation (QuEST) network questionnaires to the Mexican context and validated them through expert group and cognitive interviews with women. Pregnant women aged 18 to 49 who had their first ANC visit with a family physician were enrolled in 48 primary clinics of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social across 8 states. Care competence and women's experiences with care were the primary outcomes. The statistical analysis comprised descriptive statistics, multivariable linear and Poisson regressions. A total of 1,390 pregnant women were included in the study. During their first ANC visit, women received only 67.7% of necessary clinical actions on average, and 52% rated their ANC experience as fair or poor. Women with previous pregnancies (adjusted regression coefficient [aCoef.] -3.55; (95% confidence intervals [95% CIs]): -4.88, -2.22, p < 0.001), at risk of depression (aCoef. -3.02; 95% CIs: -5.61, -0.43, p = 0.023), those with warning signs (aCoef. -2.84; 95% CIs: -4.65, -1.03, p = 0.003), common pregnancy discomforts (aCoef. -1.91; 95% CIs: -3.81, -0.02, p = 0.048), or those who had a visit duration of less than 20 minutes (<15 minutes: aCoef. -7.58; 95% CIs: -10.21, -4.95, p < 0.001 and 15 to 19 minutes: aCoef. -2.73; 95% CIs: -4.79, -0.67, p = 0.010) and received ANC in the West and Southeast regions (aCoef. -5.15; 95% CIs: -7.64, -2.66, p < 0.001 and aCoef. -5.33; 95% CIs: -7.85, -2.82, p < 0.001, respectively) had a higher probability of experiencing poorer care competence. Higher care competence (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] 1.004; 95% CIs:1.002, 1.005, p < 0.001) and receiving care in a small clinic (aPR 1.19; 95% CIs: 1.06, 1.34, p = 0.003) compared to a medium-sized clinic were associated with a better first ANC visit experience, while common pregnancy discomforts (aPR 0.94; 95% CIs: 0.89, 0.98, p = 0.005) and shorter visit length (aPR 0.94; 95% CIs: 0.88, 0.99, p = 0.039) were associated with lower women's experience. The primary limitation of the study is that participants' responses may be influenced by social desirability bias, leading them to provide socially acceptable responses.

conclusionsWe found important gaps in adherence to ANC standards and that care competence during the first ANC visit is an important predictor of positive user experience. To inform quality improvement efforts, IMSS should institutionalize the routine monitoring of ANC competencies and ANC user experience. This will help identify poorly performing facilities and providers and address gaps in the provision of evidence-based and women-centered care.

Indexed as

Prenatal CareAdolescentAdultClinical CompetenceCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMexicoMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39226243
PMCPMC11371229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.