Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39226216›Full record

ArticleReproduction & fertility2024

From Bench to Babies - Drug Development for Male Subfertility.

Shen Chuen Khaw, Sarah Martins da Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproduction & fertility, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shen Chuen KhawS Khaw, Reproductive Medicine Research Group, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Sarah Martins da SilvaS Martins da Silva, Reproductive Medicine Research Group, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infertility is estimated to affect more than 50 million couples around the world, with male factor accounting for half of these cases, yet there is a notable absence of effective treatment options for men, other than in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). This review considers unlicensed and empirical treatments used for male subfertility, including hormonal therapy, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, and antioxidants. Compounds generally demonstrate variable improvements in sperm function but benefits for fertility are less clear. There is a pressing need for effective treatment options for subfertile men, however, our knowledge of sperm function is limited, restricting the identification of precise treatment targets. The traditional drug discovery pathway is also notorious for its extensive resource and time requirements, often extending over decades and demanding significant financial investment. Unfortunately, a substantial number of potential therapies fail before reaching the marketplace. Furthermore, reliance on mammalian models is not possible in the drug development process for male subfertility, due to significant variability between animals and man. We review recent breakthroughs and highlight novel methods aimed at improving the effectiveness and efficiency of drug discovery for male subfertility. High-throughput screening, combinatorial chemistry, and the repurposing of established medications have great potential. These strategies offer the promise of accelerating the pace of drug development, curbing the extensive demand for resources, and, in the case of drug repurposing, diminish the demand for comprehensive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies. As these innovative approaches are adopted, the feasibility of addressing male subfertility through scientific advancements appears to be increasingly attainable.

Identifiers

PMID39226216
PMCPMC11466258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.