Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39226215›Full record

ArticleExperimental physiology2024

Changes in motor unit behaviour across repeated bouts of eccentric exercise.

Oliver Hayman, Paul Ansdell, Luca Angius, Kevin Thomas, Lauren Horsbrough, Glyn Howatson, Dawson J Kidgell, Jakob Škarabot, Stuart Goodall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Oliver HaymanDepartment of Sport, Exercise, & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2100-0029
Paul AnsdellDepartment of Sport, Exercise, & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7542-1107
Luca AngiusDepartment of Sport, Exercise, & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4606-4272
Kevin ThomasDepartment of Sport, Exercise, & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2973-5337
Lauren HorsbroughDepartment of Sport, Exercise, & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Glyn HowatsonDepartment of Sport, Exercise, & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8494-2043
Dawson J KidgellMonash Exercise Neuroplasticity Research Unit, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2271-1298
Jakob ŠkarabotSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0118-1216
Stuart GoodallDepartment of Sport, Exercise, & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9029-2171

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unaccustomed eccentric exercise (EE) is protective against muscle damage following a subsequent bout of similar exercise. One hypothesis suggests the existence of an alteration in motor unit (MU) behaviour during the second bout, which might contribute to the adaptive response. Accordingly, the present study investigated MU changes during repeated bouts of EE. During two bouts of exercise where maximal lengthening dorsiflexion (10 repetitions × 10 sets) was performed 3 weeks apart, maximal voluntary isometric torque (MVIC) and MU behaviour (quantified using high-density electromyography; HDsEMG) were measured at baseline, during (after set 5), and post-EE. The HDsEMG signals were decomposed into individual MU discharge timings, and a subset were tracked across each time point. MVIC was reduced similarly in both bouts post-EE (Δ27 vs. 23%, P = 0.144), with a comparable amount of total work performed (∼1,300 J; P = 0.905). In total, 1,754 MUs were identified and the decline in MVIC was accompanied by a stepwise increase in discharge rate (∼13%; P < 0.001). A decrease in relative recruitment was found immediately after EE in Bout 1 versus baseline (∼16%; P < 0.01), along with reductions in derecruitment thresholds immediately after EE in Bout 2. The coefficient of variation of inter-spike intervals was lower in Bout 2 (∼15%; P < 0.001). Our data provide new information regarding a change in MU behaviour during the performance of a repeated bout of EE. Importantly, such changes in MU behaviour might contribute, at least in part, to the repeated bout phenomenon.

Indexed as

ElectromyographyExerciseIsometric ContractionMuscle, SkeletalAdaptation, PhysiologicalAdultFemaleHumansMaleMotor NeuronsRecruitment, NeurophysiologicalTorqueYoung Adultfatiguehigh‐density electromyographymotoneuronmuscle damagerecovery

Identifiers

PMID39226215
PMCPMC11522828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.