ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
SCIntRuler: guiding the integration of multiple single-cell RNA-seq datasets with a novel statistical metric.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding epithelial-mesenchymal transitions with multi-omics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- SeuratIntegrate: an R package to facilitate the use of integration methods with Seurat.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Reference-informed evaluation of batch correction for single-cell omics data with overcorrection awareness.Communications biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThe growing number of single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) studies highlights the potential benefits of integrating multiple datasets, such as augmenting sample sizes and enhancing analytical robustness. Inherent diversity and batch discrepancies within samples or across studies continue to pose significant challenges for computational analyses. Questions persist in practice, lacking definitive answers: Should we use a specific integration method or opt for simply merging the datasets during joint analysis? Among all the existing data integration methods, which one is more suitable in specific scenarios?
resultTo fill the gap, we introduce SCIntRuler, a novel statistical metric for guiding the integration of multiple scRNA-seq datasets. SCIntRuler helps researchers make informed decisions regarding the necessity of data integration and the selection of an appropriate integration method. Our simulations and real data applications demonstrate that SCIntRuler streamlines decision-making processes and facilitates the analysis of diverse scRNA-seq datasets under varying contexts, thereby alleviating the complexities associated with the integration of heterogeneous scRNA-seq datasets. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The implementation of our method is available on CRAN as an open-source R package with a user-friendly manual available: https://cloud.r-project.org/web/packages/SCIntRuler/index.html.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.