Trial reportEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2024
Comparing simultaneous hybrid ablation with stand-alone thoracoscopic surgical ablation for the treatment of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Retrospective Long-Term Follow-Up of the Randomized Study: Total Endoscopic Ablation of Patients With Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Observational
- Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation: Recent Advances.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsAdvanced atrial fibrillation (AF) is currently a dilemma for electrophysiologists when choosing a minimally invasive treatment strategy. Previous studies have demonstrated the outcome of either catheter ablation or thoracoscopic surgical ablation (SA) is unsatisfactory in these patients. Whether hybrid ablation (HA) could improve outcomes in these patients is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of HA for the treatment of advanced AF. METHODS AND
resultsA randomized controlled trial was designed to enrol patients with persistent AF (PerAF) and enlarged left atrium or long-standing persistent AF (LSPAF) who were randomized to HA or thoracoscopic SA at a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was freedom from any recurrence of AF off antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) 12 months after operation. The primary endpoint was monitored by 7-day electrocardiogram monitoring devices. One hundred patients were enrolled. The mean age was 58.5 ± 7.6 years, and the mean left atrial diameter (LAD) was 50.1 ± 6.1 mm. At 12 months, freedom from AF off AADs was recorded in 71.4% (35/49) of patients in HA group and 45.8% (22/48) in SA group [odds ratio 2.955, 95% confidence interval (1.275-6.848), P = 0.014]. HA significantly reduced patients' AF burden (30.2% in SA group and 14.8% in HA group, P = 0.048) and the LAD (mean differences: -5.53 ± 4.97 mm in HA group and -3.27 ± 5.20 mm in SA group, P = 0.037) at 12 months after operation.
conclusionIn patients with PerAF and enlarged left atrium or LSPAF, HA achieved better freedom from AF after 1 year of follow-up compared with thoracoscopic SA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.