ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2024
Reused Protein Segments Linked to Functional Dynamics.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- RinPy, a Python Package for Residue Interaction Network Model to Analyze Protein Structures and Predict Ligand Binding Sites.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- From atoms to fragments: a coarse representation for efficient and functional protein design.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein space is characterized by extensive recurrence, or "reuse," of parts, suggesting that new proteins and domains can evolve by mixing-and-matching of existing segments. From an evolutionary perspective, for a given combination to persist, the protein segments should presumably not only match geometrically but also dynamically communicate with each other to allow concerted motions that are key to function. Evidence from protein space supports the premise that domains indeed combine in this manner; we explore whether a similar phenomenon can be observed at the sub-domain level. To this end, we use Gaussian Network Models (GNMs) to calculate the so-called soft modes, or low-frequency modes of motion for a dataset of 150 protein domains. Modes of motion can be used to decompose a domain into segments of consecutive amino acids that we call "dynamic elements", each of which belongs to one of two parts that move in opposite senses. We find that, in many cases, the dynamic elements, detected based on GNM analysis, correspond to established "themes": Sub-domain-level segments that have been shown to recur in protein space, and which were detected in previous research using sequence similarity alone (i.e. completely independently of the GNM analysis). This statistically significant correlation hints at the importance of dynamics in evolution. Overall, the results are consistent with an evolutionary scenario where proteins have emerged from themes that need to match each other both geometrically and dynamically, e.g. to facilitate allosteric regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.