ArticleJCI insight2024
Sparsentan improves glomerular hemodynamics, cell functions, and tissue repair in a mouse model of FSGS.
Article in JCI insight, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antiproteinuric Effect of Sparsentan in Patients with Genetic-Associated FSGS Enrolled in the DUPLEX Trial.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2026Trial
- Predictors of response and long-term tolerability of sparsentan in a real-world IgA nephropathy cohort.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- Renin cells orchestrate a neuro-endocrine microenvironment of the kidney arterial tree in health and disease.JCI insight · 2026Article
- The glomerular endothelial glycocalyx as a therapeutic target in proteinuric kidney disease.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026Review
- Research trends and performance of endothelin A receptor antagonist in kidney care: a bibliometric analysis.Renal failure · 2025Article
- Renal microcirculation and mechanisms in diabetic kidney disease.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Macula densa cell angiogenic mechanisms and their therapeutic potential in kidney disease.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Mechanistic Insights Into Redox Damage of the Podocyte in Hypertension.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dual endothelin-1 (ET-1) and angiotensin II (AngII) receptor antagonism with sparsentan has strong antiproteinuric actions via multiple potential mechanisms that are more pronounced, or additive, compared with current standard of care using angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). Considering the many actions of ET-1 and AngII on multiple cell types, this study aimed to determine glomeruloprotective mechanisms of sparsentan compared to the ARB losartan by direct visualization of its effects in the intact kidney in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) using intravital multiphoton microscopy. In both healthy and FSGS models, sparsentan treatment increased afferent/efferent arteriole diameters; increased or preserved blood flow and single-nephron glomerular filtration rate; attenuated acute ET-1 and AngII-induced increases in podocyte calcium; reduced proteinuria; preserved podocyte number; increased both endothelial and renin lineage cells and clones in vasculature, glomeruli, and tubules; restored glomerular endothelial glycocalyx; and attenuated mitochondrial stress and immune cell homing. These effects were either not observed or of smaller magnitude with losartan. The pleiotropic nephroprotective effects of sparsentan included improved hemodynamics, podocyte and endothelial cell functions, and tissue repair. Compared with losartan, sparsentan was more effective in the sustained preservation of kidney structure and function, which underscores the importance of the ET-1 component in FSGS pathogenesis and therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.