Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39226058›Full record

SynthesisJAMA network open2024

Case Definition for Diagnosed Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias in Medicare.

Kan Z Gianattasio, Jason Wachsmuth, Ryan Murphy, Alex Hartzman, Jaleh Montazer, Erin Cutroneo, John Wittenborn, Melinda C Power, David B Rein

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Performance of ICD-10 code-based dementia case definition in the Health and Retirement Study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. U.S. Emergency Department Visits by Persons With Dementia: Impact of Medicare Claims Data and Undiagnosed Dementia.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Unraveling disparities in county-level dementia diagnosis prevalence across the United States.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Evaluating linked ICD-10 Medicare claims data as a method of dementia case ascertainment in research settings.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kan Z GianattasioNORC at the University of Chicago, Bethesda, Maryland.
Jason WachsmuthNORC at the University of Chicago, Bethesda, Maryland.
Ryan MurphyNORC at the University of Chicago, Bethesda, Maryland.
Alex HartzmanNORC at the University of Chicago, Bethesda, Maryland.
Jaleh MontazerNORC at the University of Chicago, Bethesda, Maryland.
Erin CutroneoNORC at the University of Chicago, Bethesda, Maryland.
John WittenbornNORC at the University of Chicago, Bethesda, Maryland.
Melinda C PowerDepartment of Epidemiology, George Washington University School of Public Health, Washington, DC.
David B ReinNORC at the University of Chicago, Bethesda, Maryland.

Funding

Developing and Evaluating a Surveillance System for Alzheimer's Dementia In the United StatesR01AG075730 · NIA · NATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER · PI David B Rein · 2022 to 2026
$2.7M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG075730
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Lack of a US dementia surveillance system hinders efforts to support and address disparities among persons living with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD). Objective: To review diagnosis and prescription drug code ADRD identification algorithms to develop and implement case definitions for national surveillance. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional study, a systematic literature review was conducted to identify unique International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) and prescription drug codes used by researchers to identify ADRD in administrative records. Code frequency of use, characteristics of beneficiaries identified by codes, and expert and author consensus around code definitions informed code placement into categories indicating highly likely, likely, and possible ADRD. These definitions were applied cross-sectionally to 2017 to 2019 Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) claims and Medicare Advantage (MA) encounter data to classify January 2019 Medicare enrollees. Data analysis was conducted from September 2022 to March 2024. Exposures: ICD-10-CM and national drug codes in FFS claims or MA encounters. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was counts and rates of beneficiaries meeting each case definition. Category-specific age, sex, race and ethnicity, MA enrollment, dual-eligibility, long-term care utilization, mortality, and rural residence distributions, as well as frailty scores and FFS monthly expenditures were also analyzed. Beneficiary characteristics were compared across categories, and age-standardized to minimize confounding by age. Results: Of the 60 000 869 beneficiaries included (50 853 806 aged 65 years or older [84.8%]; 32 567 891 female [54.3%]; 5 555 571 Hispanic [9.3%]; 6 318 194 non-Hispanic Black [10.5%]; 44 384 980 non-Hispanic White [74.0%]), there were 4 312 496 (7.2%) with highly likely ADRD, 1 124 080 (1.9%) with likely ADRD, and 2 572 176 (4.3%) with possible ADRD, totaling more than 8.0 million with diagnostic evidence of at least possible ADRD. These beneficiaries were older, more frail, more likely to be female, more likely to be dual-eligible, more likely to use long-term care, and more likely to die in 2019 compared with beneficiaries with no evidence of ADRD. These differences became larger when moving from the possible ADRD group to the highly likely ADRD group. Mean (SD) FFS monthly spending was $2966 ($4921) among beneficiaries with highly likely ADRD compared with $936 ($2952) for beneficiaries with no evidence of ADRD. Differences persisted after age standardization. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study of 2019 Medicare beneficiaries identified more than 5.4 million Medicare beneficiaries with evidence of at least likely ADRD in 2019 using the diagnostic case definition. Pending validation against clinical and other methods of ascertainment, this approach can be adopted provisionally for national surveillance.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDementiaMedicareAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHumansInternational Classification of DiseasesMaleUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39226058
PMCPMC11372506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.