Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39225980›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2025

Easy-fix attentional focus manipulation boosts the intuitive and deliberate use of base-rate information.

Esther Boissin, Serge Caparos, John Abi Hana, Cyann Bernard, Wim De Neys

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Esther BoissinDepartment of Psychology, Cornell University, Uris hall, 109 Tower Rd, Ithaca, NY, 14850, USA. boissinesther@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6485-7466
Serge CaparosUniversité Paris 8, DysCo lab, Saint-Denis, France.
John Abi HanaUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, LaPsyDÉ, Paris, France.
Cyann BernardUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, Paris, France.
Wim De NeysUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, LaPsyDÉ, Paris, France.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-23-CE28-0004-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addressing human reasoning biases, "easy-fix" attentional focus interventions have shown that we can prompt reasoners to align responses with logico-mathematical principles. The current study aimed to test the impact of such interventions on both intuitive and deliberate responses on base-rate items. Using a two-response paradigm, participants provided initial intuitive responses under time constraints and cognitive load, followed by deliberate responses. During the intervention, we used attentional focus manipulations with base-rate items that aimed to redirect participants' attention toward the "logical" base-rate cue (i.e., the logical intervention) or toward the "heuristic" descriptive cue (i.e., the heuristic intervention). The results indicate that the logical intervention led to improved alignment with logico-mathematical principles in both intuitive and deliberate responses, albeit with a modest effect size. Conversely, the heuristic intervention had no discernible impact on accuracy. This indicates that our attentional focus manipulation is more effective at getting reasoners to respect rather than to override base-rates.

Indexed as

AttentionHeuristicsMathematical ConceptsThinkingAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultDebiasingEasy fixHeuristics and biasesIntuitions

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.