Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39225959›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2025

Application of random survival forest to establish a nomogram combining clinlabomics-score and clinical data for predicting brain metastasis in primary lung cancer.

Zhongxiang Shi, Yixin Chen, Aoyu Liu, Jingya Zeng, Wanlin Xie, Xin Lin, Yangyang Cheng, Huimin Xu, Jialing Zhou, Shan Gao and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Zhongxiang Shi *Department of Clinical Laboratory, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, 150081, Heilongjiang, China.
Yixin Chen *Department of Clinical Laboratory, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, 150081, Heilongjiang, China.
Aoyu LiuImaging Center, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, 150081, Heilongjiang, China.
Jingya ZengDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, 150081, Heilongjiang, China.
Wanlin XieDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, 150081, Heilongjiang, China.
Xin LinDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, 150081, Heilongjiang, China.
Yangyang ChengDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, 150081, Heilongjiang, China.
Huimin XuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, 150081, Heilongjiang, China.
Jialing ZhouDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, 150081, Heilongjiang, China.
Shan GaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, 150081, Heilongjiang, China.
Chunyuan FengDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, 150081, Heilongjiang, China.
Hongxia ZhangImaging Center, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, 150081, Heilongjiang, China. zhanghongxia2k@163.com.
Yihua SunDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, 150081, Heilongjiang, China. 600611@hrbmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8027-2927

Funding

Haiyan Scientifc Research Fund of Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital JJZD2024-23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo establish a nomogram for predicting brain metastasis (BM) in primary lung cancer at 12, 18, and 24 months after initial diagnosis.

methodsIn this study, we included 428 patients who were diagnosed with primary lung cancer at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital between January 2020 and January 2022. The endpoint event was BM. The patients were randomly categorized into two groups in a 7:3 ratio: training (n = 299) and validation (n = 129) sets. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator was utilized to analyze the laboratory test results in the training set. Furthermore, clinlabomics-score was determined using regression coefficients. Then, clinlabomics-score was combined with clinical data to construct a nomogram using random survival forest (RSF) and Cox multivariate regression. Then, various methods were used to evaluate the performance of the nomogram.

resultsFive independent predictive factors (pathological type, diameter, lymph node metastasis, non-lymph node metastasis and clinlabomics-score) were used to construct the nomogram. In the validation set, the bootstrap C-index was 0.7672 (95% CI 0.7092-0.8037), 12-month AUC was 0.787 (95% CI 0.708-0.865), 18-month AUC was 0.809 (95% CI 0.735-0.884), and 24-month AUC was 0.858 (95% CI 0.792-0.924). In addition, the calibration curve, decision curve analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves revealed a good performance of the nomogram.

conclusionsFinally, we constructed and validated a nomogram to predict BM risk in primary lung cancer. Our nomogram can identify patients at high risk of BM and provide a reference for clinical decision-making at different disease time points.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsNomogramsAdultAgedFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBrain metastasisClinlabomicsClinlabomics-scoreLung cancerNomogramRandom survival forest

Identifiers

PMID39225959
PMCPMC12000196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.