ReviewAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2024
Predictors and Management of Inadequate Response to JAK Inhibitors in Alopecia Areata.
Review in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Efficacy of JAK Inhibitors in Acute vs Nonacute Alopecia Areata: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2026Article
- Real-World Outcomes of Baricitinib and Ritlecitinib in Refractory Alopecia Areata: Response Predictors and Relapse After Discontinuation or Dose Reduction.The Journal of dermatology · 2026Article
- High-Dose Baricitinib for Severe Alopecia Areata with Suboptimal Response to Conventional Therapy: A Real-World Assessment.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Defining a Therapeutic Window of Opportunity in Alopecia Areata: Predictors of Early Response to Baricitinib.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Therapeutic Burden as Predictor of Response to Baricitinib for Alopecia Areata in Real Life: Prospective Study.Dermatology and therapy · 2025Article
- Jak inhibitor intraclass switch in Alopecia Areata patients: a retrospective review of cases at an academic center.Archives of dermatological research · 2025Article
- Longitudinal clinical course, treatment outcomes, and relapse patterns in alopecia areata: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Correlation between increased total serum IgE levels and clinical features in alopecia areata patients.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alopecia areata is a common autoimmune disorder characterized by non-scarring hair loss on the scalp or other hair-bearing surface. In recent years, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have shown promise in the treatment of alopecia areata by disrupting the signaling pathways involved in immune-mediated hair follicle damage. However, some patients with alopecia areata exhibit insufficient responses to JAK inhibitors. This review aims to explore the predictive factors for poor responses to JAK inhibitors in patients with alopecia areata and to discuss alternative treatment strategies in such cases. Patients with a longer duration of the current episode and higher baseline severity are at an increased risk of inadequate JAK inhibitor responses. Oral administration rather than topical application, and extended treatment durations, correlate with a favorable response. Notably, the poor response to JAK inhibitors in alopecia areata may be related to the amount and functional depletion of regulatory T cells resulting from an augmented T helper-2-type immune response. For patients with poor responses to JAK inhibitors, treatment adjustments may include increasing the dosage, extending the treatment duration, combination therapies, or switching to alternative JAK inhibitors. For patients with atopic comorbidities or psychological problems, it is important to select corresponding treatment options to optimize patient outcomes. Further research is needed to establish more reliable predictors and improve overall patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39225949What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.