Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39225940›Full record

ReviewDiscover nano2024

Electrocatalytic ethanol oxidation reaction: recent progress, challenges, and future prospects.

Jasvinder Kaur, Ram K Gupta, Anuj Kumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Discover nano, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jasvinder KaurDepartment of Chemistry, School of Sciences, IFTM University, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, 244102, India. jasvinderkaur2911@gmail.com.
Ram K GuptaDepartment of Chemistry, Pittsburg State University, Pittsburg, KS, 66762, USA.
Anuj KumarDepartment of Chemistry, GLA University, Mathura, 281406, India. anuj.kumar@gla.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct ethanol fuel cells (DEFCs) have been widely considered as a feasible power conversion technology for portable and mobile applications. The economic feasibility of DEFCs relies on two conditions: a notable reduction in the expensive nature of precious metal electrocatalysts and a simultaneous remarkable improvement in the anode's long-term performance. Despite the considerable progress achieved in recent decades in Pt nanoengineering to reduce its loading in catalyst ink with enhanced mass activity, attempts to tackle these problems have yet to be successful. During the ethanol oxidation reaction (EOR) at the anode surface, Pt electrocatalysts lose their electrocatalytic activity rapidly due to poisoning by surface-adsorbed reaction intermediates like CO. This phenomenon leads to a significant loss in electrocatalytic performance within a relatively short time. This review provides an overview of the mechanistic approaches during the EOR of noble metal-based anode materials. Additionally, we emphasized the significance of many essential factors that govern the EOR activity of the electrode surface. Furthermore, we provided a comprehensive examination of the challenges and potential advancements in electrocatalytic EOR.

Indexed as

Direct ethanol fuel cellsElectrocatalystsEthanol oxidation reactionPt-based catalysts

Identifiers

PMID39225940
PMCPMC11371986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.