Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39225920›Full record

SynthesisLa Radiologia medica2024

Diagnostic accuracy of periapical radiography and panoramic radiography in the detection of apical periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Giulio Stera, Martina Giusti, Andrea Magnini, Linda Calistri, Rossana Izzetti, Cosimo Nardi

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in La Radiologia medica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A preliminary study on quantitative assessment of apical lesion area.American journal of translational research · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Giulio Stera, Florence, Italy.
Martina GiustiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Andrea MagniniRadiodiagnostic Unit n. 2, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence-Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Linda CalistriRadiodiagnostic Unit n. 2, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence-Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Rossana IzzettiUnit of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
Cosimo NardiRadiodiagnostic Unit n. 2, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence-Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy. cosimo.nardi@unifi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5489-7824

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveApical periodontitis (AP) is one of the most common pathologies of the oral cavity. An early and accurate diagnosis of AP lesions is crucial for proper management and planning of endodontic treatments. This study investigated the diagnostic accuracy of periapical radiography (PR) and panoramic radiography (PAN) in the detection of clinically/surgically/histopathologically confirmed AP lesions.

methodA systematic literature review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The search strategy was limited to English language articles via PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases up to June 30, 2023. Such articles provided diagnostic accuracy values of PR and/or PAN in the detection of AP lesions or alternatively data needed to calculate them.

resultsTwelve studies met inclusion criteria and were considered for the analysis. The average value of diagnostic accuracy in assessing AP lesions was 71% for PR and 66% for PAN. According to different accuracy for specific anatomical areas, it is recommended to use PR in the analysis of AP lesions located in the upper arch and lower incisor area, whereas lower premolar and molar areas may be investigated with the same accuracy with PR or PAN.

conclusionsTwo-dimensional imaging must be considered the first-level examination for the diagnosis of AP lesions. PR had an overall slightly higher diagnostic accuracy than PAN. Evidence from this review provided a useful tool to support radiologists and dentists in their decision-making when inflammatory periapical bone lesions are suspected to achieve the best clinical outcome for patients, improving the quality of clinical practice.

Indexed as

Periapical PeriodontitisRadiography, PanoramicHumansApical periodontitisDiagnostic accuracyPanoramic radiographyPeriapical radiographyTwo-dimensional imaging

Identifiers

PMID39225920
PMCPMC11554819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.