Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39225915›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2024

Endoscopic Management of Biliary and Pancreatic Pathologies in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Patients: Development of a Treatment Algorithm Based on 9-Year Experience.

Laurent Monino, Lancelot Marique, Yannick Deswysen, Maximilien Thoma, Pierre H Deprez, Pierre Goffette, Benoit Navez, Tom G Moreels

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laurent MoninoDepartment of Hepatogastroenterology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium. laurent.monino@chu-montpellier.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-7922-0396
Lancelot MariqueDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Yannick DeswysenDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Maximilien ThomaDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Pierre H DeprezDepartment of Hepatogastroenterology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Pierre GoffetteDepartement of Radiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Benoit NavezDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Tom G MoreelsDepartment of Hepatogastroenterology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManagement of biliopancreatic pathology in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) patients is challenging despite the availability of multiple approaches like single-balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP (SBE-ERCP), laparoscopy-assisted ERCP (LA-ERCP), and EUS-directed transgastric intervention (EDGI). We evaluated the outcomes of the interchangeable combination of endoscopic procedures to treat biliopancreatic pathology in RYGB patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis is a monocentric retrospective study of consecutive RYGB patients with biliopancreatic pathology between June 2014 and September 2023. Primary endpoints were technical success, adverse events (AE), and parameters of endoscopic procedures according to etiology. A clinically useful management algorithm was developed.

resultsA total of 102 patients with RYGB (73 women; mean age 55 ± 10 years) were included. A total of 113 SBE-ERCP (in 90 patients), 26 EDGI (in 23 patients), and 2 LA-ERCP (in 2 patients) were performed. Technical success of SBE-ERCP was lower compared to EDGI (74.4% vs 95.1%, p = 0.002). The AE rate was lower using SBE-ERCP compared to EDGI (12.4% vs 38.5%, p = 0.003). Two sub-groups based on etiology were identified as "common bile duct stone" (CBDS) and "Other." In the CBDS group, the mean number and time of procedures were lower in SBE-ERCP as the first-line technique compared to first-line EDGI (1.1 vs 2.7, p < 0.00 and 91 ± 20.7 min vs 161 ± 61.3 min, p < 0.00).

conclusionA combination of endoscopic procedures can achieve high technical success in managing biliopancreatic pathology in RYGB patients with an acceptable AE rate. In the case of CBDS, SBE-ERCP appeared to be a good first-line single-step option. For other indications, EDGI should be proposed as the first line.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeGastric BypassLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidAdultBalloon EnteroscopyBiliary Tract DiseasesEndosonographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic DiseasesPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesEDGIEUS-transgastric ERCPLaparoscopy-assisted ERCPRoux-en-Y gastric bypassSingle-balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.