ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2024
Three-dimensional printed calcium phosphate scaffolds emulate bone microstructure to promote bone regrowth and repair.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current and emerging biomaterials for targeted drug delivery in osteomyelitis management.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Biofunctionalization of mineralized collagen with platelet-rich plasma enhances osteogenesis in critical-sized bone defects.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- [Research progress on strontium modified β-tricalcium phosphate composite biomaterials with immune regulatory properties].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Review
- Assessment of the Osseointegration of Pure-Phase β-Tricalcium Phosphate (β-TCP) Ceramic Cylinder Implants in Critical Segmental Radial Bone Defects in Rabbits.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The interconnected structures in a 3D scaffold allows the movement of cells and nutrients. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the in-vivo bioactivity of 3D-printed β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) and hydroxyapatite (HAP) scaffolds that replicate biological bone. This study included 24-week-old male New Zealand white rabbits. A cylindrical bone defect with a diameter of 4.5 mm and a depth of 8 mm was created in the lateral aspect of the distal femur. A 3D-printed scaffold was implanted in the right femur (experimental side), whereas the left femur was kept free of implantation (control side). Micro-CT analysis and histological observations of the bone defect site were conducted at 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively to track the bone repair progress. No evidence of new bone tissue formation was found in the medullary cavity of the bone defect on the control side. In contrast, on the experimental side, the 3D scaffold demonstrated sufficient bioactivity, leading to the growth of new bone tissue. Over time, new bone tissue gradually extended from the periphery toward the center, a phenomenon evident in both micro-CT images and biopsy staining. In the current study, we observed that the cells involved in bone metabolism adhered, spread, and proliferated on our newly designed 3D-printed scaffold with a bone microstructure. Therefore, it is suggested that this scaffold has sufficient bioactivity to induce new bone formation and could be expected to be a more useful artificial bone than the existing version.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.