ReviewNeurosurgical review2024
Deep brain stimulation for obsessive compulsive disorder: the functional neurosurgeon armamentarium.
Review in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a neurosurgical procedure that utilizes implanted electrodes and electrical stimulation for the treatment of neurological disorders. In cases where patients present with severe functional impairment while being refractory to less invasive treatment options, DBS is considered "gold standard." Still, DBS-related work is still widely under investigation, with ethical issues arising that may impact a patient's physical and psycho-social status. These include patient selection, informed consent, patient autonomy, pre-operation counseling and professional psycho-social preparation and follow-up support. Bioethicists and philosophers have increasingly worked together with in clinicians and researchers to identify, address and present ethical consideration in both clinical practice and research to balance the risk-benefit ratio in DBS treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39225911What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.