ArticleTropical animal health and production2024
Comparison of machine learning algorithms and multiple linear regression for live weight estimation of Akkaraman lambs.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating machine learning algorithms for accurate prediction of yearling weight in Magra sheep.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Article
- A comparative evaluation of machine learning algorithms for predicting chicken egg weight from egg quality traits.Veterinary and animal science · 2026Article
- Application of XGBoost and Random Forest algorithms for body weight prediction in Blackbelly sheep using biometric measurements.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Reply to the comment on: comparison of machine learning algorithms and multiple linear regression for live weight estimation of Akkaraman lambs.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Article
- From machine learning to digital twin integration for livestock production and research.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
- Application of Supervised Machine Learning Techniques and Digital Image Analysis for Predicting Live Weight in Anadolu-T Broilers.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Prediction of body weight in indigenous sheep using random forest regression, support vector regression, and classification and regression trees algorithms.Veterinary and animal science · 2025Article
- Smarter ways to predict rabbit body weight across multiple breeds.Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2025Article
- Development of Machine Learning-Based Sub-Models for Predicting Net Protein Requirements in Lactating Dairy Cows.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Predicting Weaning Weight of Romanov Lambs From Biometric Measurements Before Weaning Age Using Machine Learning Algorithms.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Article
- A comment on manuscript Comparison of machine learning algorithms and multiple linear regression for live weight estimation of Akkaraman lambs.Tropical animal health and production · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was designed to predict the post-weaning weights of Akkaraman lambs reared on different farms using multiple linear regression and machine learning algorithms. The effect of factors the age of the dam, gender, type of lambing, enterprise, type of flock, birth weight, and weaning weight was analyzed. The data was collected from a total of 25,316 Akkaraman lambs raised at multiple farms in the Çiftlik District of Niğde province. Comparative analysis was conducted by using multiple linear regression, Random Forest, Support Vector Machines (and Support Vector Regression), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) (and Gradient Boosting), Bayesian Regularized Neural Network, Radial Basis Function Neural Network, Classification and Regression Trees, Exhaustive Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection (and Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection), and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines algorithms. In this study, the test dataset was divided into five layers using the K-fold cross-validation method. The performance of models was compared using performance criteria such as Adjusted R-squared (Adj-[Formula: see text]), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD), and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) by utilizing test populations in the predicted models. Additionally, the presence of low standard deviations for these criteria indicates the absence of an overfitting problem. [Formula: see text]The comparison results showed the Random Forest algorithm had the best predictive performance compared to other algorithms with Adj-[Formula: see text], RMSE, MAD, and MAPE values of 0.75, 3.683, 2.876, and 10.112, respectively. In conclusion, the results obtained through Multiple Linear Regression for the live weights of Akkaraman lambs were less accurate than the results obtained through artificial neural network analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.