ReviewTranslational stroke research2025
Integrated Strategies for Targeting Arteriogenesis and Angiogenesis After Stroke.
Review in Translational stroke research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeted proteomic analysis identifies ACVRL1 as a marker of cerebral edema in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026Article
- Melatonin Promotes Cerebral Angiogenesis in Ischemic Mice via BMP6/Smad1/5/9 Pathway.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Article
- Blood-brain barrier repair: potential and challenges of stem cells and exosomes in stroke treatment.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The interdependence between arteriogenesis and angiogenesis is crucial for enhancing perfusion by synchronously improving leptomeningeal collaterals (LMCs) and microvascular networks after stroke. However, current approaches often focus on promoting arteriogenesis and angiogenesis separately, neglecting the potential synergistic benefits of targeting both processes simultaneously. Therefore, it is imperative to consider both arteriogenesis and angiogenesis as integral and complementary strategies for post-stroke revascularization. To gain a deeper understanding of their relationships after stroke and to facilitate the development of targeted revascularization strategies, we compared them based on their timescale, space, and pathophysiology. The temporal differences in the occurrence of arteriogenesis and angiogenesis allow them to restore blood flow at different stages after stroke. The spatial differences in the effects of arteriogenesis and angiogenesis enable them to specifically target the ischemic penumbra and core infarct region. Additionally, the endothelial cell, as the primary effector cell in their pathophysiological processes, is promising target for enhancing both. Therefore, we provide an overview of key signals that regulate endothelium-mediated arteriogenesis and angiogenesis. Finally, we summarize current therapeutic strategies that involve these signals to promote both processes after stroke, with the aim of inspiring future therapeutic advances in revascularization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39225878What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.