ArticleEndocrine2025
Standard operating procedure (SOP) for cervical ultrasound cine loop video sequences in the follow-up of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC).
Article in Endocrine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound Risk Stratification of Autonomously Functioning Thyroid Nodules: Cine Loop Video Sequences Versus Static Image Captures.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RATIONALE AND
objectivesCervical ultrasound (US) is crucial in the follow-up of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). However, there are no guidelines for its acquisition and documentation, particularly concerning the role of additional video sequences, known as US cine loops (UCL). The aim of this study is to examine the clinical relevance (CR) of a new Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for cervical UCL in DTC follow-up. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on all UCL examinations of DTC follow-up patients at a tertiary care center between January 2010 and February 2018 to determine their clinical significance. The patients were divided into two groups: those with no documented CR (UCL-nCR) and those with documented CR (UCL-CR). The study reviewed the respective written medical US reports that were validated by experienced residents. The UCL-CR were categorized in: confirmation of a suspicious finding that was identified during conventional live US (UCL-CR
resultsA total of 5512 UCLs in 652 DTC patients were analyzed, with 71.5% women and a mean age of 50 years. More than 90% of the tumors were low-risk at initial staging. The mean number of UCLs per patient was 8.5 ± 4.6. Overall, 95 cases of UCL-CR were identified in 82 patients (12.6%), with a patient-based number needed to scan of 8. UCL-CR
conclusionsIn 12.6% of the patients, the additional acquisition and archiving of cervical UCL revealed clinical relevance in the course of DTC disease. The invalidation of suspicious findings through the retrospective analysis of former UCL occurred as the most significant benefit of this method. The UCL SOP can be easily and quickly integrated into the US workflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.