Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39225870›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2024

Molecular detection of Coxiella burnetii in ticks infesting wild and domestic animals in the Eastern region of Punjab, Pakistan.

Freeha Amin, Shahzad Ali, Muhammad Imran, Nora G Cleary, Michael E von Fricken, Iahtasham Khan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Freeha AminDepartment of Wildlife & Ecology, Discipline of Zoology, Wildlife Epidemiology and Molecular Microbiology Laboratory (One Health Group), University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Ravi Campus, Pattoki, 55300, Pakistan.
Shahzad AliDepartment of Wildlife & Ecology, Discipline of Zoology, Wildlife Epidemiology and Molecular Microbiology Laboratory (One Health Group), University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Ravi Campus, Pattoki, 55300, Pakistan. shahzad.ali@uvas.edu.pk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4281-2659
Muhammad ImranInstitute of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (UVAS), Lahore, Pakistan.
Nora G ClearyDepartment of Environmental and Global Health, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Michael E von FrickenDepartment of Environmental and Global Health, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Iahtasham KhanDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tick-borne pathogens are significant for human, veterinary, and wildlife health. Coxiella burnetii is an example that is widely distributed across various hosts and can cross species boundaries. In Pakistan, there is a scarcity of data regarding C. burnetii at the intersection of wildlife and livestock. Ticks were collected from ruminants and wildlife from the districts of Kasur, Pakpattan, and Okara in Pakistan. Five tick species totaling 571 ticks were collected, with the following distribution: 56.4% Hyalomma anatolicum, 22.4% Rhipicephalus microplus, 10.5% Hyalomma marginatum, 7.9% Rhipicephalus sanguineus, and 2.8% Rhipicephalus turanicus. Fifty tick pools were screened for C. burnetii to amplify a segment of the IS1111 using real-time PCR assays. Ticks collected from sheep and goats had a greater rate of positivity for C. burnetii (40% and 38%, respectively) compared to Indian long-eared hedgehogs with a prevalence of 2%. Coxiella burnetii was prominent in Rhipicephalus microplus (92.3%) and Hyalomma anatolicum (88.9%), followed by Rhipicephalus turanicus (66.6%), Rhipicephalus sanguineus (33.3%), and Hyalomma marginatum (25.0%). Ticks from Pakpattan district displayed the highest prevalence of C. burnetii (88.9%), whereas the lowest was observed in ticks from Kasur district (77.3%). There was no significant association between tick gender and C. burnetii infection. Female host animals were more likely to harbor ticks containing C. burnetii, with a prevalence rate of 81.8%. The research underscores the urgent need for comprehensive studies on C. burnetii in Pakistan, especially at the interface of wildlife and livestock. The high prevalence rates observed in certain tick species and geographic regions emphasize the importance of targeted public health interventions. Future research should focus on elucidating the transmission dynamics and implementing effective control measures to mitigate the impact of these pathogens on human, veterinary, and wildlife health in the region.

Indexed as

Animals, WildCoxiella burnetiiGoatsIxodidaeQ FeverTick InfestationsAnimalsAnimals, DomesticFemaleGoat DiseasesHedgehogsMalePakistanPrevalenceReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSheepAnimal hostCoxiella burnetiiReal-time PCRTicks

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.