ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2024
A large vertebral artery fenestration involving the distal segments associated with bilateral duplication of the superior cerebellar artery: a case report.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Double vertebral arteries associated with a persistent primitive lateral basilovertebral anastomosis: A rare embryological configuration.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2026Article
- Right posterior cerebral artery fenestration coexisting with bilateral superior cerebellar artery duplications diagnosed by magnetic resonance angiography.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of our study is to report a case of a large fenestrated vertebral artery (FVA) and bilateral duplication of the superior cerebellar artery (SCA) incidentally diagnosed using Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) and Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA). CASE PRESENTATION: A 63-year-old female patient presenting to the neurology clinic with complaints of dizziness and balance disorder. CTA and DSA revealed a large FVA involving the V3 and V4 segments. Additionally, we observed bilateral duplicated SCAs originating from the distal basilar artery. DISCUSSION: FVA is a rare anomaly resulting from fusion failure during the embryological period, with a reported incidence of 0.1%. FVA is often (70%) detected in the extracranial region, but it can also occur intracranially at a frequency of approximately 30%. Although various nomenclatures are used in the literature, we identified only two reports of a single fenestration encompassing the V3 and V4 segments, i.e., involving both the extracranial and intracranial regions. While duplication of the SCA is relatively common, bilateral duplication of SCA occurs at a rate of 0.9-5%.
conclusionThis case report describes an unusual case of VA fenestration involving both extracranial and intracranial segments, along with bilateral duplication of the SCAs. While rare, these findings highlight the importance of recognizing such vascular anomalies, which could be relevant for planning surgical or endovascular procedures in the posterior circulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39225865What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.