ArticleDiscover oncology2024
The effect of preoperative supplementary parenteral nutrition on nutrition and inflammation in gastric cancer patients.
Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Value of the Albumin-Myosteatosis Gauge in Predicting the Postoperative Outcomes of Non-Metastatic Gastric Cancer.Cancers · 2026Article
- Efficacy of double-point jejunostomy in laparoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer: a comparative study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesSupplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN) is recommended to add when enteral nutrition alone is not sufficient. This research aims to evaluate the effect of preoperative SPN in patients with gastric cancer.
methodsA total of 180 patients with gastric cancer were divided into three groups (60 patients per group) according to different nutritional support scheme. The primary endpoint was the changes in nutrition and inflammatory, while the secondary endpoint included the changes in prognosis.
resultsCompared with the control group, there were significant differences in nutrition and inflammation related indicators in the oral nutrition supplement (ONS) group and the SPN + ONS group (P < 0.05). Compared with the ONS group, the SPN + ONS group showed significant differences in the above indicators (P < 0.05). However, no significant changes were observed in the incidence of complications, the postoperative exhaust time, and the hospitalization time.
conclusionsPreoperative SPN had a positive effect on nutrition and inflammation of gastric cancer patients undergoing surgery, but had no significant effect on their prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.