ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2024
[Cardiac arrhythmias in adults with congenital heart disease].
Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In patients with congenital heart disease, cardiac arrhythmias are complex and require a thorough understanding of the anatomy, past surgical and interventional procedures, and the specific electric processes. Supraventricular tachycardias commonly present as emergency situations and should be treated immediately, particularly when there is an underlying complex malformation. Establishing sinus rhythm is usually superior to pure frequency control for hemodynamic reasons. Catheter ablation should be preferred over medical treatment, even though several procedures are often necessary. In addition, bradycardia is seen more frequently in congenital heart defects; this could be aggravated by antiarrhythmic drugs. There are significant differences between the indications and techniques used for pacemaker implantation in patients with congenital heart defects and those without. Patients with complex congenital heart diseases have an increased risk of thromboembolism; therefore, an individual and early indication for low-threshold oral anticoagulation is necessary; direct oral anticoagulants can also be used for this purpose. In risk stratification for sudden cardiac death, the principles of general guidelines are often not applicable, and individualized decisions are required. Recently, a new general risk score for congenital heart disease has been developed. The treatment of cardiac arrhythmias in patients with congenital heart disease should always be performed in close cooperation with specialized centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39225799What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.