Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39225775›Full record

ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2024

PET radiomics-based lymphovascular invasion prediction in lung cancer using multiple segmentation and multi-machine learning algorithms.

Seyyed Ali Hosseini, Ghasem Hajianfar, Pardis Ghaffarian, Milad Seyfi, Elahe Hosseini, Atlas Haddadi Aval, Stijn Servaes, Mauro Hanaoka, Pedro Rosa-Neto, Sanjeev Chawla and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. UsingEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Seyyed Ali HosseiniTranslational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7542-7541
Ghasem HajianfarRajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Pardis GhaffarianChronic Respiratory Diseases Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Milad SeyfiDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Elahe HosseiniDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
Atlas Haddadi AvalSchool of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran.
Stijn ServaesTranslational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Mauro HanaokaDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Pedro Rosa-NetoTranslational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Sanjeev ChawlaDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Habib ZaidiDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland. habib.zaidi@hug.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7559-5297
Mohammad Reza AyDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. mohammadreza_ay@sina.tums.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study aimed to predict lymphovascular invasion (LVI) using multiple machine learning algorithms and multi-segmentation positron emission tomography (PET) radiomics in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, offering new avenues for personalized treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes. One hundred and twenty-six patients with NSCLC were enrolled in this study. Various automated and semi-automated PET image segmentation methods were applied, including Local Active Contour (LAC), Fuzzy-C-mean (FCM), K-means (KM), Watershed, Region Growing (RG), and Iterative thresholding (IT) with different percentages of the threshold. One hundred five radiomic features were extracted from each region of interest (ROI). Multiple feature selection methods, including Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (MRMR), Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), and Boruta, and multiple classifiers, including Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Logistic Regression (LR), XGBoost (XGB), Naive Bayes (NB), and Random Forest (RF), were employed. Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) was also used to determine if it boosts the area under the ROC curve (AUC), accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SEN), and specificity (SPE). Our results indicated that the combination of SMOTE, IT (with 45% threshold), RFE feature selection and LR classifier showed the best performance (AUC = 0.93, ACC = 0.84, SEN = 0.85, SPE = 0.84) followed by SMOTE, FCM segmentation, MRMR feature selection, and LR classifier (AUC = 0.92, ACC = 0.87, SEN = 1, SPE = 0.84). The highest ACC belonged to the IT segmentation (with 45 and 50% thresholds) alongside Boruta feature selection and the NB classifier without SMOTE (ACC = 0.9, AUC = 0.78 and 0.76, SEN = 0.7, and SPE = 0.94, respectively). Our results indicate that selection of appropriate segmentation method and machine learning algorithm may be helpful in successful prediction of LVI in patients with NSCLC with high accuracy using PET radiomics analysis.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsLung NeoplasmsMachine LearningPositron-Emission TomographyAdultAgedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessRadiomicsROC CurveLymphovascular invasionMachine learningNSCLCPETRadiomicsSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID39225775
PMCPMC11666702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.