ArticleRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024
[Diagnostics and treatment of pulmonary artery embolisms].
Article in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years the diagnostics of pulmonary artery embolisms (PE) has gained significance, with confirmation occurring in only about 15-25 % of suspected cases. Despite technological advances, radiological methods remain problematic due to radiation and contrast medium exposure. Clinical scores play a crucial role in the risk assessment of PE. High-risk situations call for specific measures, while negative D‑dimers can help avoid overdiagnosis. Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) remains the gold standard with high sensitivity and specificity. Treatment requires an interdisciplinary team (pulmonary embolism response team, PERT). Anticoagulation is an option for stable patients, while in unstable or unsuccessful courses, thrombolysis or interventional procedures can be considered. Side effects, especially the risk of bleeding, need to be considered for both forms of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39225761What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.