ArticleHepatology communications2024
Long-term impact of scheduled regular endoscopic interventions for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Article in Hepatology communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding hepatopancreatobiliary cancer risks in a population-based primary sclerosing cholangitis-inflammatory bowel disease cohort.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2026Article
- Management of primary sclerosing cholangitis: Current state-of-the-art.Hepatology communications · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is associated with biliary obstructions that can require endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). While the beneficial effects of ERCP are well documented, follow-up interventional strategies are less defined, and their long-term impact is debated.
methodsWe evaluated the outcome of a scheduled program of ERCP-guided interventions that have been developed and implemented at our tertiary liver center for more than 20 years. Within our center, follow-up ERCPs were performed at regular intervals to treat previously detected morphological stenosis independent of clinical symptoms. We calculated the transplant-free survival (TFS) of patients who were enrolled in the scheduled ERCP program and compared it to patients who received follow-up ERCPs only on clinical demand. Moreover, we documented the occurrence of hepatic decompensation, recurrent cholangitis episodes, hepatobiliary malignancies, and endoscopy-related adverse events.
resultsIn our retrospective study, we included 201 patients with PSC who all received an ERCP. In all, 133 patients received scheduled follow-up ERCPs and 68 received follow-up ERCPs only on demand. The rates of TFS since initial diagnosis (median TFS: 17 vs. 27 y; P = 0.020) and initial presentation (median TFS: 16 vs. 11 y; P = 0.002) were higher in patients receiving scheduled versus on-demand ERCP. Subgroup analysis revealed that progression in cholangiographic findings between the first and second ERCP was associated with a poorer outcome compared to patients without progression (17 y vs. undefined; P = 0.021).
conclusionIn conclusion, we report the outcome data of a scheduled follow-up ERCP program for patients with PSC in an experienced high-volume endoscopy center. Our data suggest the initiation of multicenter randomized controlled prospective trials to explore the full potential of regular endoscopic follow-up treatment as a strategy to prevent disease progression in patients with PSC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.