Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39225447›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of neurology2024

Education for fatigue management in people with multiple sclerosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Maria Janina Wendebourg, Jana Poettgen, Marcia Finlayson, Marien Gonzalez-Lorenzo, Christoph Heesen, Sascha Köpke, Andrea Giordano

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria Janina WendebourgDepartment of Clinical Research, Neurology Clinic and Policlinic, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4812-8807
Jana PoettgenInstitute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
Marcia FinlaysonSchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Marien Gonzalez-LorenzoLaboratorio di Metodologia delle Revisioni Sistematiche e Produzione di Linee Guida, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Christoph HeesenInstitute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8131-9467
Sascha KöpkeInstitute of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Andrea GiordanoNeuroepidemiology Unit, Neurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeFatigue is a common and disabling symptom in multiple sclerosis (MS). Educational interventions have shown potential to reduce fatigue. The aim was to systematically review the current best evidence on patient education programmes for MS-related fatigue.

methodsThis was a systematic review and meta-analysis following Cochrane methodology. A systematic search was conducted in eight databases (September 2023). Moreover, reference lists and trial registers were searched and experts in the field were contacted. Randomized controlled trials were included evaluating patient education programmes for people with MS with the primary aim of reducing fatigue.

resultsIn total, 1176 studies were identified and assessed by two independent reviewers; 15 studies (1473 participants) were included. All interventions provided information and education about different aspects of MS-related fatigue with different forms of application, some with components of psychological interventions. Amongst those, the most frequently applied were cognitive behavioural therapy (n = 5) and energy-conservation-based approaches (n = 4). Studies differed considerably concerning mode of intervention delivery, number of participants and length of follow-up. Interventions reduced fatigue severity (eight studies, n = 878, standardized mean difference -0.28; 95% confidence interval -0.53 to -0.03; low certainty) and fatigue impact (nine studies, n = 824, standardized mean difference -0.21; 95% confidence interval -0.42 to 0.00; moderate certainty) directly after the intervention. Mixed results were found for long-term effects on fatigue, for secondary endpoints (depressive symptoms, quality of life, coping) and for subgroup analyses.

conclusionEducational interventions for people with MS-related fatigue may be effective in reducing fatigue in the short term. More research is needed on long-term effects and the importance of specific intervention components, delivery and context.

Indexed as

FatigueMultiple SclerosisPatient Education as TopicCognitive Behavioral TherapyHumansfatiguemeta‐analysismultiple sclerosispatient educationsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39225447
PMCPMC11555147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.