ArticleStroke2024
Time-Dependent Potentiation of the PERK Branch of UPR by GPR68 Offers Protection in Brain Ischemia.
Article in Stroke, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Potentiation of GPR68 alleviates post-ischemia BBB dysfunction and brain edema in mice.Experimental neurology · 2026Article
- The dual role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in cerebral ischemia: from adaptive protection to apoptotic induction.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn ischemia, acidosis occurs in/around injured tissue and parallels disease progression. Therefore, targeting an acid-sensitive receptor offers unique advantages in achieving the spatial and temporal specificity required for therapeutic interventions. We previously demonstrated that increased expression of GPR68 (G protein-coupled receptor 68), a proton-sensitive G protein-coupled receptor, mitigates ischemic brain injury. Here, we investigated the mechanism underlying GPR68-dependent protection.
methodsWe performed biochemical and molecular analyses to examine poststroke signaling. We used in vitro brain slice cultures and in vivo mouse transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO) models to investigate ischemia-induced injuries.
resultsGPR68 deletion reduced PERK (protein kinase R-like ER kinase) expression in mouse brain. Compared with the wild-type mice, the GPR68-/- (knockout) mice exhibited a faster decline in eIF2α (eukaryotic initiation factor-2α) phosphorylation after tMCAO. Ogerin, a positive modulator of GPR68, stimulated eIF2α phosphorylation at 3 to 6 hours after tMCAO, primarily in the ipsilateral brain tissue. Consistent with the changes in eIF2α phosphorylation, Ogerin enhanced tMCAO-induced reduction in protein synthesis in ipsilateral brain tissue. In organotypic cortical slices, Ogerin reduced pH 6 and oxygen-glucose deprivation-induced neurotoxicity. Following tMCAO, intravenous delivery of Ogerin reduced brain infarction in wild-type but not knockout mice. Coapplication of a PERK inhibitor abolished Ogerin-induced protection. Delayed Ogerin delivery at 5 hours after tMCAO remained protective, and Ogerin has a similar protective effect in females. Correlated with these findings, tMCAO induced GPR68 expression at 6 hours, and Ogerin alters post-tMCAO proinflammatory/anti-inflammatory cytokine/chemokine expression profile.
conclusionsThese data demonstrate that GPR68 potentiation leads to neuroprotection, at least in part, through enhancing PERK-eIF2α activation in ischemic tissue but has little impact on healthy tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.