ArticleTurkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences2024
Timolol Maleate
Article in Turkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of cellular, mechanical, and optical properties of different polymers for corneal tissue engineering.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to prepare a sustained-delivery mucoadhesive-thermosensitive formulation containing poloxamer 338 (P338), poloxamer 188 (P188), and mucoadhesive agents, such as chitosan (CHT) and carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), to increase the ophthalmic bioavailability of timolol maleate (TM). Materials and Methods: Gels were prepared by mixing different amounts of P338, P188, and a mucoadhesive agent in cold isotonic water using a magnetic stirrer. The sol-gel gelation time of the gels was determined using the test tube inversion method. Viscosity measurements and analysis of the mechanical properties of the gel formulations were performed. Results: The gelation times of formulations containing 20:2.5 (P338:P188) and 0.1% CMC and formulations containing 20:2.5 (P338:P188) and 0.1% CHT were 35 s and 26.67 s, respectively. An optimally selected CHT mucoadhesive-thermosensitive Conclusion: The improved mucoadhesive-thermosensitive
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.