ArticleBioinformatics advances2024
synphage: a pipeline for phage genome synteny graphics focused on gene conservation.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chemical inactivation of a bacterial immune system de-domesticates a temperate phage and promotes its spread.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Lysogenic control of Bacillus subtilis morphology and fitness by Spbetavirus phi3T.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Taxonomic and functional diversity of alkali-tolerant bacteria enriched from the Taklimakan Desert.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Visualization and comparison of genome maps of bacteriophages can be very effective, but none of the tools available on the market allow visualization of gene conservation between multiple sequences at a glance. In addition, most bioinformatic tools running locally are command line only, making them hard to setup, debug, and monitor. Results: To address these motivations, we developed synphage, an easy-to-use and intuitive tool to generate synteny diagrams from GenBank files. This software has a user-friendly interface and uses metadata to monitor the progress and success of the data transformation process. The output plot features colour-coded genes according to their degree of conservation among the group of displayed sequences. The strength of synphage lies also in its modularity and the ability to generate multiple plots with different configurations without having to re-process all the data. In conclusion, synphage reduces the bioinformatic workload of users and allows them to focus on analysis, the most impactful area of their work. Availability and implementation: The synphage tool is implemented in the Python language and is available from the GitHub repository at https://github.com/vestalisvirginis/synphage. This software is released under an Apache-2.0 licence. A PyPI synphage package is available at https://pypi.org/project/synphage/ and a containerized version is available at https://hub.docker.com/r/vestalisvirginis/synphage. Contributions to the software are welcome whether it is reporting a bug or proposing new features and the contribution guidelines are available at https://github.com/vestalisvirginis/synphage/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.