Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39224795›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Exploring student preferences for implementing a digital mental health intervention in a university setting: Qualitative study within a randomised controlled trial.

Hayley M Jackson, Amelia Gulliver, Penelope Hasking, Liana Leach, Philip J Batterham, Alison L Calear, Louise M Farrer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hayley M JacksonCentre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8216-0336
Amelia GulliverCentre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6351-9844
Penelope HaskingCurtin enAble Institute and School of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Liana LeachNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Philip J BatterhamCentre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4547-6876
Alison L CalearCentre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Louise M FarrerCentre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Digital interventions can be effective in preventing and treating common mental health conditions among university students. Incorporating student experiences and perspectives in the design and implementation of these programmes may improve uptake and engagement. This qualitative study explored university students' perspectives of a low-intensity video-based mental health intervention, their recommendations for implementing the programme in university settings, and their views and recommendations to address barriers to engagement. Methods: Participants (N = 115) were students (mean = 20.63 years, SD = 2.10) with elevated distress from 31 Australian universities drawn from a randomised controlled trial of the Uni Virtual Clinic-Lite (UVC-Lite). Data from students randomised to the intervention condition were collected via semi-structured interviews (n = 12) and open-ended questions during post-intervention surveys (n = 103). Data were analysed using content analysis. Results: Participants generally reported positive views of the intervention, and most felt it should be offered to students as a universal intervention. Multiple methods of disseminating the intervention were suggested, including through university counselling, official platforms (e.g. student support services) and informal channels (e.g. word-of-mouth promotion). Difficulty integrating the programme into everyday life, pre-existing beliefs about mental health and technology-related factors were highlighted as barriers to engagement. Conclusion: A low-intensity video-based mental health intervention was generally considered to be acceptable and appropriate for students with mild to moderate distress. Participants provided several suggestions to encourage uptake of the intervention and possible pathways to disseminate the intervention to students. The effectiveness of these should be examined in future trials.

Indexed as

engagementinternet-based interventionmental healthqualitative researchstudentsUniversitiesyoung people

Identifiers

PMID39224795
PMCPMC11367696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.