ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2024
Do sex and gender aspects influence non-adherence to secondary prevention measures after myocardial infarction?
Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating physical healthcare into psychiatry for severe mental illness: A narrative review and position statement from the ECNP PAN-Health group.Neuroscience applied · 2026Review
- The Association of C-Reactive Protein-Triglyceride Glucose Index with Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction [Letter].Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- The Bidirectional Relationship Between Myocardial Infarction and Depression: Risk Factors, Mechanisms, and Interventions.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Sex and Gender-Based Differences in Outcomes of Cardiac Rehabilitation Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
- Influence of Sex on Therapeutic Adherence in Cardiovascular Diseases: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Acceptance of Illness and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients After Myocardial Infarction-Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Compliance Behaviour After a Coronary Ischaemic Event: A Quasi-Experimental Study of Adherence to a Protocolised Follow-Up in Primary Care.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of non-adherence to preventive interventions, its clinical consequences, and factors associated with non-adherence to secondary prevention measures, with a special emphasis on sex and gender. Methods: Prospective observational study of patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in whom an evaluation of adherence to medication, Mediterranean diet, physical activity, and cardiac rehabilitation was performed after 6 and 12 months, with systematic assessment of predictors including patient-, disease-, psychological-, social-, and gender-related factors using self-administered questionnaires. Results: Of 503 patients included, 101 (20,1%) were females. At one year, 85% of patients did not adhere to at least one of the recommendations with no differences between females and males. However, two factors more frequent in females, caregiver burden (adjusted OR, 1.45; 95%CI, 1.08-1.94) and depressive symptoms (adjusted OR, 1.40; 95%CI, 1.03-1.92) predicted non-adherence to all measures together. Chronic kidney disease (aOR, 3.24; 95%CI, 1.02-10.48) and being female (aOR, 2.21; 95%CI, 1.18-4.13) were associated with non-adherence to the Mediterranean diet; diabetes with organ damage (aOR, 12.06; 95%CI, 1.93-7.69) and older age (aOR, 0.96 per year; 95%CI, 0.93-0.99), among others, with physical activity; and higher body mass index with cardiac rehabilitation participation (aOR, 1.07; 95%CI, 1.002-1.14) and completion (aOR, 1.14; 95%CI, 1.03-1.26). Conclusion: Adherence to all secondary prevention measures after AMI remains very low and is associated with several gender-related factors. Multidisciplinary intervention strategies targeting the most vulnerable patient groups, such as females or patients with diabetes, obesity, chronic kidney disease, or depression, are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.