Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39224752›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024

Cardiac (tele)rehabilitation in routine clinical practice for patients with coronary artery disease: protocol of the REHAB + trial.

Rutger F R van Mierlo, Vitalis J G Houben, Sem A O F Rikken, Juan Jose Gómez-Doblas, Jordi Lozano-Torres, Arnoud W J van 't Hof

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05207072 (Prospective Observational Trial for a Cardiac Rehabilitation eHealth Application in Post-ACS Patients; Assessment of the Effects on Sustainability and Participation Level), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05207072 unknown statusnot on this map

Prospective Observational Trial for a Cardiac Rehabilitation eHealth Application in Post-ACS Patients; Assessment of the Effects on Sustainability and Participation Level (REHAB+)

TypeobservationalSponsorMaastricht UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled900ConditionsCardiac Rehabilitation, Acute Coronary Syndrome
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Post-discharge digital self-management for acute coronary syndrome patients: A scenario-based design and implementation.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rutger F R van Mierlo *Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, Netherlands.
Vitalis J G Houben *Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, Netherlands.
Sem A O F RikkenDepartment of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands.
Juan Jose Gómez-DoblasDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
Jordi Lozano-TorresDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Arnoud W J van 't HofDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiac rehabilitation programs face the challenge of suboptimal participation, despite being a level Ia recommendation. Cardiac telerehabilitation, with its potential to engage patients who might otherwise not show interest, necessitates the adaption of existing center-based cardiac rehabilitation programs to facilitate rehabilitation at home. REHAB + is a mobile cardiac telerehabilitation program cocreated with patients and rehabilitation centers, aiming to future-proof cardiac rehabilitation and improve accessibility. The REHAB + application enables users to remotely communicate with their coach, receive on-demand feedback on health goal progression, and reduces the need for frequent in-person meetings at the cardiac rehabilitation center. The REHAB + study seeks to compare patient-related outcomes and characteristics of patients between those offered the option to participate in cardiac telerehabilitation and those attending center-based cardiac rehabilitation over a twelve-month period. Methods: The REHAB + study is a multicenter, prospective, matched controlled, observational study that includes (N)STEMI patients eligible for cardiac rehabilitation. We aim to enroll 300 participants for cardiac telerehabilitation and 600 for center-based cardiac rehabilitation. Participants opting for cardiac telerehabilitation (REHAB+) will be matched with center-based cardiac rehabilitation participants. Additionally, characteristics of patients unwilling to participate in either center-based rehabilitation or telerehabilitation but are willing to share their demographics will be collected. The primary endpoint is quality of life measured with the SF-36 questionnaire at three and twelve months, with patient-related characteristics driving intervention choice as the most important secondary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include physical activity, modifiable risk factors, and digital health experience. The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov with registration number NCT05207072. Discussion: The REHAB + trial is unique by offering patients freedom to choose between cardiac telerehabilitation and center-based rehabilitation. The integration of digital components into cardiac rehabilitation has the potential to complement behavioral change strategies for specific patient groups. Offering patients the option of cardiac telerehabilitation next to center-based rehabilitation could enhance overall cardiac rehabilitation participation rates.

Indexed as

cardiac rehabilitationcardiac telerehabilitationeHealthphysical activityquality of liferehabilitationtele healthtele monitoring

Identifiers

PMID39224752
PMCPMC11367104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.