Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39224718›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Artificial Intelligence in Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology: A Narrative Review of Its Current and Evolving Picture.

Ayushi Ghosh Moulic, Sagar S Gaurkar, Prasad T Deshmukh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Vocal Cord Dysfunction: Evaluating the Utility of AI Large Language Models for Patient Education.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Comparative Analysis of Information Quality in Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology: Clinicians, Residents, and Large Language Models.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ayushi Ghosh MoulicOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Sagar S GaurkarOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Prasad T DeshmukhOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With technological advancements, artificial intelligence (AI) has progressed to become a ubiquitous part of human life. Its aspects in otorhinolaryngology are varied and are continuously evolving. Currently, AI has applications in hearing aids, imaging technologies, interpretation of auditory brain stem systems, and many more in otology. In rhinology, AI is seen to impact navigation, robotic surgeries, and the determination of various anomalies. Detection of voice pathologies and imaging are some areas of laryngology where AI is being used. This review gives an outlook on the diverse elements, applications, and advancements of AI in otorhinolaryngology. The various subfields of AI including machine learning, neural networks, and deep learning are also discussed. Clinical integration of AI and otorhinolaryngology has immense potential to revolutionize the healthcare system and improve the standards of patient care. The current applications of AI and its future scopes in developing this field are highlighted in this review.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningmachine learningotologyrhinology

Identifiers

PMID39224718
PMCPMC11366564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.