Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39224583›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in immunology2024

Intensive oral prophylaxis does not alter the tongue microbiome in young patients with chronic kidney disease: longitudinal, randomized, controlled study.

Karolin C Hoefer, Lutz T Weber, Anna Greta Barbe, Isabelle Graf, Stefanie Thom, Rasmus Ehren, Angela Nowag, Hilmar Wisplinghoff, Michael J Noack, Claus J Scholz and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Karolin C HoeferFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Polyclinic of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Lutz T WeberDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Children's and Adolescents Hospital, Pediatric Nephrology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Anna Greta BarbeFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Polyclinic of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Isabelle GrafDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Stefanie ThomWisplinghoff Laboratories, Cologne, Germany.
Rasmus EhrenDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Children's and Adolescents Hospital, Pediatric Nephrology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Angela NowagWisplinghoff Laboratories, Cologne, Germany.
Hilmar WisplinghoffWisplinghoff Laboratories, Cologne, Germany.
Michael J NoackFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Polyclinic of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Claus J ScholzWisplinghoff Laboratories, Cologne, Germany.
Nathalie JazmatiWisplinghoff Laboratories, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Gingivitis is a common intraoral disease in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), which poses a particular interdisciplinary challenge. We aimed to determine the influence of an intensive oral prophylaxis program (OPP) compared to standard prevention measures on the tongue microbiome of young patients with CKD. Methods: Thirty patients with CKD (mean age 14.2 ± 5.2 years) and generalized gingivitis were included. The effects of the intensive OPP were compared with standard prophylaxis according to statutory health insurance (treatment as usual, TAU) as a control. Tongue swabs were taken from the patients at baseline (t1) and after 3 (t2) and 6 (t3) months. Next-generation sequencing of 16S rDNA genes was used to quantitatively characterize microbial communities. Results: There were no differences in the abundance, richness, or diversity of the observed genera and species between the two study groups at baseline or after 3 or 6 months. Furthermore, no change in predefined gingivitis and oral health bacterial clusters were found. At the phylum level, Firmicutes were decreased after intervention in the TAU group (t2 Conclusions: Despite the intensity of dental prophylaxis and decreasing clinical signs of inflammation and decreasing plaque amount, no clinically relevant changes in the tongue microbiome were observed. Our results confirm the conserved and stable nature of the tongue microbiome, even in children with CKD.

Indexed as

GingivitisMicrobiotaRenal Insufficiency, ChronicTongueAdolescentChildFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleYoung Adultadolescentschildchronic kidney diseasedental prophylaxismicrobiomeoral healthtongue

Identifiers

PMID39224583
PMCPMC11366650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.